ArticleResearch in pharmaceutical sciences2024
The mutual effect of progesterone and vitamin D in an animal model of peripheral nerve injury.
Article in Research in pharmaceutical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Vitamin D in Neuropathic Pain: Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Experimental and clinical studies have shown the potential role of progesterone in relieving neural injury. In addition, emerging data on vitamin D, a steroid hormone, have shown its neuroprotective properties. This study was designed to evaluate the mutual effect of vitamin D and progesterone on neuropathic pain (NP) in male rats. Experimental approach: Chronic constriction injury (CCI) was induced by inserting four ligatures around the sciatic nerve. Hyperalgesia and allodynia (cold and mechanical) were considered positive behavioral scores of NP. After surgery, Sprague Dawley male rats (weighing 200-250 g) were assigned into 7 groups. Vitamin D (250 and 500 units/kg/day, i.p.) and progesterone (4 and 6 mg/kg/day, i.p.) were injected from the 1 Findings/Results: Daily supplementation with vitamin D (250 and 500 units/kg) did not alter nociception. Progesterone (4 and 6 mg/kg/day) was ineffective on thermal hyperalgesia. In the allodynia test, progesterone significantly decreased pain-related behaviors. The co-administration of vitamin D (500 units/kg/day) with progesterone (6 mg/kg/day) significantly relieved thermal hyperalgesia. Finally, the combination significantly decreased cold and mechanical allodynia. Conclusion and implications: This study showed the mutual effect of progesterone and vitamin D on NP for the first time. Hyperalgesia and allodynia were significantly relieved following co-administration of vitamin D and progesterone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.