ArticleInfectious diseases & clinical microbiology2024
Antimicrobial Use Among Outpatients at Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma Central Zone of Tanzania: A Prospective Descriptive Study.
Article in Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Irrational antimicrobial use (AMU) has led to an exponential increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in hospitals and communities, which creates challenges in treating infectious diseases caused by bacteria. This study aimed to evaluate antimicrobial prescriptions and usage patterns for treating bacterial infections among outpatients at Benjamin Mkapa Hospital (BMH). Materials and Methods: A prospective descriptive study design was used to evaluate the AMU trend. The data were collected from August 2022 to October 2022 from outpatient pharmacies at BMH using the World Health Organization/International Network of Rational Use of Drugs (WHO/INRUD) indicators. The simple random sampling method was employed to select the prescriptions. The WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch, and Reserve) classification was used to classify common antimicrobials. We analyzed the prevalence of outpatient AMU, including the types of antimicrobials, indications, and compliance with treatment guidelines. We also examined the number of antimicrobials per prescription and the adherence to drug use. Results: We examined 1557 prescriptions, 406 (26.1%) (WHO recommendation 20.0-26.8%) of which included antimicrobials. All prescriptions with antimicrobials were written in generic names, drug utilization-90% (DU90%) was 100% (WHO recommendation 100%). The number of parenteral antimicrobials prescribed was 79 (19.5%) (WHO recommendation 13.4-24.1%). Furthermore, prescriptions with antimicrobials that complied with the current Standard Treatment Guidelines and National Essential Medicine List in Tanzania (STG/NEMLIT) were 369 (90.9%) (WHO recommendation 100%). Most antimicrobials were prescribed as monotherapy, accounting for 265 (65.3%). There were 1.4 (WHO recommendation 1.6-1.8) antimicrobials per prescription. Our study identified 21 commonly prescribed antimicrobials, whereby 9 (42.9%) (WHO recommendation >60%) antimicrobials were Access, 10 (47.6%) (WHO recommendation <20%) Watch, and 2 (9.5%) (WHO recommendation <1%) Reserved classes. Conclusion: Our study showed that BMH has optimal practices for prescribing and using antimicrobials for outpatients. It further underlined the need to expand and strengthen antimicrobial stewardship efforts to reinforce prescribing antimicrobials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.