Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39400461›Full record

Trial reportEpilepsia open2024

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy outcomes of the Investigation of Levetiracetam in Alzheimer's disease (ILiAD) study: a pilot, double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial.

Arjune Sen, Sofia Toniolo, Xin You Tai, Mary Akinola, Mkael Symmonds, Sergio Mura, Joanne Galloway, Angela Hallam, Jane Y C Chan, Ivan Koychev and 12 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Excitation-inhibition homeostasis in Alzheimer's disease: a selective multiscale review of mechanisms, sex differences, and therapeutic opportunities.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Arjune SenOxford Epilepsy Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8948-4763
Sofia TonioloDepartment of Neurology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1833-4995
Xin You TaiOxford Epilepsy Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Mary AkinolaLocal Clinical Trials Network, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Mkael SymmondsOxford Epilepsy Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Sergio MuraClinical Trials Pharmacy, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Joanne GallowayCPSU, Oxford Health Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Angela HallamSt Mary's Pharmaceutical Unit, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Jane Y C ChanFreeline Therapeutics, King's Court, Stevenage, UK.
Ivan KoychevDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Chris ButlerFaculty of Medicine, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, UK.
John GeddesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gabriel Davis JonesOxford Epilepsy Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Younes TabiDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Raquel MaioNuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Eleni FrangouMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Faculty of Pop Health Sciences, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
Sharon LoveMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Faculty of Pop Health Sciences, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
Sian ThompsonDepartment of Neurology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Rohan Van Der PuttMemory and Cognition Research Delivery Team, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Sanjay G ManoharDepartment of Neurology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Rupert McShaneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Masud HusainDepartment of Neurology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Funding

UCB Pharma IIS-2015-106611United Kingdom Medical Research Council Confidence in Concept BRR00020 HM00.01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether the antiseizure medication levetiracetam may improve cognition in individuals with Alzheimer's disease who have not previously experienced a seizure.

methodsWe performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover pilot study in individuals with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Electroencephalography was performed at baseline and those with active epileptiform discharges were excluded. Eligible participants were randomized to placebo for 12 weeks or an active arm of oral levetiracetam (4 weeks up-titration to levetiracetam 500 mg twice daily, 4 weeks maintained on this dose followed by 4 weeks down-titration to nil). Participants then crossed over to the other arm. The primary outcome was change in cognitive function assessed by the Oxford Memory Task, a task sensitive to hippocampal memory binding. Secondary outcomes included tolerability, other neuropsychological scales, and general questionnaires.

resultsRecruitment numbers were severely limited owing to restrictions from the COVID-19 pandemic at the time of the study. Eight participants completed both arms of the study (mean age 68.4 years [SD = 9.2]; 5 females [62.5%]). No participants withdrew from the study and there was no significant difference between reported side effects in the active levetiracetam or placebo arm. Measures of mood and quality of life were also not significantly different between the two arms based on participant or carer reports. In limited data analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between participants in the active levetiracetam and placebo arm on the memory task. SIGNIFICANCE: This pilot study demonstrates that levetiracetam was well tolerated in individuals with Alzheimer's disease who do not have a history of seizures and has no detrimental effect on mood or quality of life. Larger studies are needed to assess whether levetiracetam may have a positive effect on cognitive function in subsets of individuals with Alzheimer's disease. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Abnormal electrical activity within the brain, such as is seen in seizures, might contribute to memory problems in people with dementia. We completed a clinical trial to see if an antiseizure medication, levetiracetam, could help with memory difficulties in people with Alzheimer's disease (the most common cause of dementia). In this pilot study, we could not prove whether levetiracetam helped memory function. We did show that the drug is safe and well tolerated in people with dementia who have not had a seizure. This work, therefore, offers a platform for future research exploring antiseizure medications in people with dementia.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnticonvulsantsCross-Over StudiesLevetiracetamAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsLevetiracetamantiseizure medicationsdementiaepilepsyOxford Memory Testseizure

Identifiers

PMID39400461
PMCPMC11633694

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.