ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2025
Assessment of Aortic Dissection Remodeling With Patient-Specific Fluid-Structure Interaction Models.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- False Lumen Haemodynamics in Type B Aortic Dissection: An in Vitro Study Using PIV and Patient-Specific Flexible Phantoms.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Aortic dissection as a disease of vascular wall homeostasis: integrating vasa vasorum-inflammation-metabolism axis for mechanistic insight and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Investigating the role of structural wall stress in aortic growth prognosis in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Personalized biventricular mechanics and sensitivity to model morphology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- 3D-printed in vitro models of Stanford type B aortic dissection: A scoping review.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental andProgress in materials science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aortic dissection leads to late complications due tochronic degeneration and dilatation of the false lumen. This study examines the interaction between hemodynamics and long-term remodeling of a patient's aortic dissection, tracked from pre-dissection to the chronic phase using CT angiography. Fluid-structure interaction models with tissue prestress, external support, and anisotropic properties were used to analyze hemodynamic markers. Each aortic wall layer had distinct thicknesses and material properties. The boundary conditions were guided by in vitro 4D-flow MRI and the patient's blood pressure. Aortic dilatation was most significant distal to the left subclavian artery, reaching 6 cm in the chronic phase. Simulations quantified the flow jet velocity through the entry tear, which peaked at 185 cm/s in the subacute phase and decreased to 123 to 133 cm/s in the chronic phase, corresponding to an increased entry tear size. Flow jet impingement on the false lumen resulted in a localized pressure increase of 11 and 2 mmHg in the subacute and chronic phases, with wall shear stress reaching 4 Pa. These hemodynamic changes appear to be the main drivers of aortic growth and morphological changes. Despite moderate overall flap movement, in-plane displacement increased from 0.6 to 1.8 mm as disease progressed, which was associated with an overall increase in aortic diameter. Simulations with a significant reduction in flap stiffness during the subacute phase resulted in increased flap motion up to 9.5 mm. Although these results are based on a single patient, they suggest a strong relationship between hemodynamics and aortic growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.