ArticleMedical physics2025
Using a patient-specific diffusion model to generate CBCT-based synthetic CTs for CBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Conditional Diffusion Models for CT Image Synthesis from CBCT: A Systematic Review.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Pooled it
- Patient outcome prognosis for external beam radiation therapy using CBCT-based radiomics: a systematic review.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2026Pooled it
- Equivariant conditional diffusion model for head and neck CT image synthesis from CBCT.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Review
- Diffusion Models in Oncology: a Review of Current Applications.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Deep Learning for CT Synthesis in Radiotherapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) can be used to evaluate the inter-fraction anatomical changes during the entire course for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). However, CBCT artifacts from various sources restrict the full application of CBCT-guided adaptive radiation therapy (ART). PURPOSE: Inter-fraction anatomical changes during ART, including variations in tumor size and normal tissue anatomy, can affect radiation therapy (RT) efficacy. Acquiring high-quality CBCT images that accurately capture patient- and fraction-specific (PFS) anatomical changes is crucial for successful IGRT.
methodsTo enhance CBCT image quality, we proposed PFS lung diffusion models (PFS-LDMs). The proposed PFS models use a pre-trained general lung diffusion model (GLDM) as a baseline, which is trained on historical deformed CBCT (dCBCT)-planning CT (pCT) paired data. For a given patient, a new PFS model is fine-tuned on a CBCT-deformed pCT (dpCT) pair after each fraction to learn the PFS knowledge for generating personalized synthetic CT (sCT) with quality comparable to pCT or dpCT. The learned PFS knowledge is the specific mapping relationships, including personal inter-fraction anatomical changes between personalized CBCT-dpCT pairs. The PFS-LDMs were evaluated on an institutional lung cancer dataset, quantified by mean absolute error (MAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), normalized cross-correlation (NCC), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) metrics. We also compared our PFS-LDMs with a mainstream GAN-based model, demonstrating that our PFS fine-tuning strategy could be applied to existing generative models.
resultsOur models showed remarkable improvements across all four evaluation metrics. The proposed PFS-LDMs outperformed the GLDM, demonstrating the effectiveness of our proposed fine-tuning strategy. The PFS model fine-tuned with CBCT images from four prior fractions, reduced the MAE from 103.95 to 15.96 Hounsfield units (HU), and increased the mean PSNR, NCC, and SSIM from 25.36 dB to 33.57 dB, 0.77 to 0.98, and 0.75 to 0.97, respectively. Applying our PFS fine-tuning strategy to a Cycle GAN model also showed improvements, with all four fine-tuned PFS Cycle GAN (PFS-CG) models outperforming the general Cycle GAN model. Overall, our proposed PFS fine-tuning strategy improved CBCT image quality compared to both the pre-correction and non-fine-tuned general models, with our proposed PFS-LDMs yielding better performance than the GAN-based model across all metrics.
conclusionsOur proposed PFS-LDMs significantly improve CBCT image quality with increased HU accuracy and fewer artifacts, thus better capturing inter-fraction anatomical changes. This lays the groundwork for enabling CBCT-based ART, which could enhance clinical efficiency and achieve personalized high-precision treatment by accounting for inter-fraction anatomical changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.