ArticleBMJ open quality2024
Improving the provision of emotional support for patients following major lower limb amputation.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major lower limb amputation (MLLA) is a lifesaving but life-altering surgical procedure. Psychological distress is common and typically heightened in the acute postoperative period. Despite the negative impact that poor psychological functioning can have on the health outcomes of this population, there is a lack of high-quality guidance outlining how to best support the psychological needs of individuals post-MLLA. The aim of this project was to develop practical and feasible interventions for improving the provision of emotional support for all patients on the vascular surgical ward post-MLLA. Adapted from the Holistic Needs Assessment Adversity-Restoration-Compatibility framework used within oncology services to provide holistic care to patients, the project included two key interventions. The primary intervention involved developing a model for an 'emotionally supportive conversation' (ESC), which was delivered by a member of the vascular surgical team under supervision of a Clinical Psychologist. During the 6-month implementation phase, 27 patients received an ESC, an average of 8 days post-MLLA. The secondary intervention involved training for vascular surgical ward staff, led by a Clinical Psychologist. This focused on raising awareness of common signs of distress, building skills and confidence in responding to distress and providing information on where to signpost patients for further support. Prior to the primary and secondary interventions, 43% of patients reported receiving sufficient information from hospital staff on how they would feel postoperatively and 57% stated they had received sufficient support from staff during their stay. Post-implementation, these figures increased to 86% and 71%, respectively. This project represents a novel, creative and cost-effective way for psychological services to add value to the quality of care provided to vascular surgical patients during the inpatient phase post-MLLA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.