ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Enrichment of Fat Graft with Association of ASC and Nanofat in an Animal Model.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-energy Morpheus8 and Nanofat Grafting for Compartment-specific Facial Rejuvenation: Selective Fat Remodeling and Skin Quality Enhancement.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Frog skin as an alternative temporary dressing for diabetic foot ulcers treatment: animal model.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFat graft (FG) absorption rate varies from 20 to 80% in two years. Recently, several bioengineering techniques were applied to improve FG retention rate. Numerous studies investigated the use of adipocyte-derived stem cells (ASC) as FG enrichment. However, ASC production is costly, complex, and time-consuming. In contrast, Nanofat, a combination of lipids, stem cells and growth factors, offers a faster, simpler, and more cost-effective alternative for FG enrichment.
objectiveThis study aims to compare the effects of ASC with those of Nanofat, as a viable option in FG enrichment. MATERIAL AND
methodsAnimals were allocated in three groups: Control group (1 mL fat), ASC group (1 mL fat +1x10
resultsAt week 12, ASC and NnF groups showed a higher retention of FG when compared to the Control group (51%, 46%, 12% respectively, p < 0.01). Fibrosis was similar in ASC and Nanofat groups. The Nanofat group showed a higher vascular density then the Control group (p < 0.05). Il-10 gene expression was higher, and Mmp9 was lower in the Nanofat group when compared to the ASC and Control groups.
conclusionThis study indicates that enriching FG with both ASC and Nanofat led to an increased retention rate of the FG, suggesting that Nanofat might be a promising alternative for FG enrichment. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39402194What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.