ArticleBMC oral health2024
On the osteogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells by a fabricated porous nano-hydroxyapatite substrate loaded with sodium fluoride.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Indirect 3D printing in tissue engineering: expanding materials used for improved scaffold functionality.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the present study, nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HA) powder was extracted from carp bone waste to fabricate porous n-HA substrates by a molding and sintering process. Subsequently, the substrates were loaded with different amounts of sodium fluoride (NaF) through immersion in NaF suspensions for 10, 7.5, and 5 min. The NaF-loaded n-HA substrates were then examined for their structural and physical properties, chemical bonds, loading and release profile, pH changes, cytotoxicity, and osteogenic effect on dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) at the level of RNA and protein expression. The results showed that the n-HA substrates were porous (> 40% porosity) and had rough surfaces. The NaF could be successfully loaded on the substrates, which was 6.43, 4.50, and 1.47 mg, respectively for n-HA substrates with immersion times of 10, 7.5, and 5 min in the NaF suspensions. It was observed that the NaF release rate was rather fast during the first 24 h in all groups (39.06%, 36.43%, and 39.57% for 10, 7.5, and 5 min, respectively), and decreased dramatically after that, indicating a slow detachment of NaF. Furthermore, the pH of the medium related to all materials was changed during the first 4 days of immersion (from 7.38 to pH of about 7.85, 7.84, 7.63, and 7.66 for C0, C5, C7.5, and C10, respectively). The pH of media associated with the C7.5, and C10 increased up to 4 days and remained relatively constant until day 14 (pH = 7.6). The results of the cytotoxicity assay rejected any toxicity of the fabricated NaF-loaded n-HA substrates on DPSCs, and the cells could adhere to their surfaces with enlarged morphology. The results showed no effect on the osteogenic differentiation at the protein level. Nevertheless, this effect was observed at the gene level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.