Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39402534›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2024

Urban-rural differences in preferences for traditional Chinese medicine services among chronic disease patients: a discrete choice experiment.

Fan Jiang, Yuting Feng, Wen Zong, Jianing Xue, Wanning Chen, Liu Qizhi, Jiao Zhang, Aijun Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fan JiangSchool of Health Economic and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yuting FengCenter for Global Public Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Beijing, China.
Wen ZongSchool of Health Economic and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Jianing XueSchool of Health Economic and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Wanning ChenSchool of Health Economic and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Liu QizhiNanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Jiao Zhang *School of Health Economic and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China. zhangjiao5263@163.com.
Aijun Xu *School of Health Economic and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China. xuaijun2000@163.com.

Funding

Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China NO. 22YJCZH236Jiangsu Traditional Chinese Medicine Inheritance Innovation Development Research Center No. JSZYYJD2024A07National Social Science Foundations of China NO. 2018VJX065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, the demand for medical services from chronic disease patients has become diversified and personalized. The advantages and role of traditional Chinese medicine in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases gradually emerging. The preferences and willingness to pay for traditional Chinese medicine services (TCMS) among patients with chronic diseases, as well as any disparities between urban and rural patients, have not been examined in past studies.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the preferences of chronic disease patients for TCMS, explore the value/importance that patients place on different treatment attributes, and evaluate whether there are urban-rural differences in their preferences and willingness to pay for TCMS.

methodsA total of 317 patients from Jiangsu Province, China participated in a discrete choice experiment that elicited the preferences for TCMS. The choice questions were constructed by six attributes: out-of-pocket (OOP) cost, institution, medical provider, treatment method, treatment duration, treatment efficacy. Mixed logit models were used to estimate the stated preference and marginal willingness to pay for each attribute.

resultsThe choice preferences of chronic disease patients for TCMS in this study were influenced by the four attributes: institution, treatment method, and treatment efficacy, and OOP cost. Improvements in treatment efficacy were the most concerning, followed by being treated in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospital. Patients were willing to pay more to get better treatment outcomes. Compared with primary care institutions, patients were willing to pay more for treatment in TCM hospitals. The preferences for economic attribute (OOP cost) varied between urban and rural areas, and rural patients tended to favor scenarios that imposed a lower economic burden on them.

conclusionThe chronic disease patients' preferences for TCMS were determined mainly by treatment efficacy but also by institution, treatment method and OOP cost. The urban-rural difference in preference identified in this study highlights that effective policy interventions should consider the characteristics of patients' demand in different regions.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorMedicine, Chinese TraditionalPatient PreferenceRural PopulationUrban PopulationAdultAgedChinaChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesChronic diseasesDiscrete choice experimentIntegrative medicinePatient preferencesTraditional Chinese medicine servicesUrban-rural disparities

Identifiers

PMID39402534
PMCPMC11475649

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.