ReviewJournal of translational medicine2024
Artificial intelligence-based evaluation of prognosis in cirrhosis.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology and hepatology: Current applications and future perspectives.World journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Electroencephalography in hepatic encephalopathy: diagnostic and prognostic applications across the disease spectrum.Annals of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Review
- The Kidney in the Shadow of Cirrhosis: A Critical Review of Renal Failure.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- eCBT-I dialogue system: a comparative evaluation of large language models and adaptation strategies for insomnia treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting early liver metastasis after pancreatic cancer surgery.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Hepatic cirrhosis and decompensation: Key indicators for predicting mortality risk.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- The Hepato-Cardio-Renal Axis in Cirrhosis: Hemodynamic and Mechanistic Insights, Diagnostic Biomarkers, and Expanding Therapeutic Horizons.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cirrhosis represents a significant global health challenge, characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates that severely impact human health. Timely and precise prognostic assessments of liver cirrhosis are crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing mortality rates as they enable physicians to identify high-risk patients and implement early interventions. This paper features a thorough literature review on the prognostic assessment of liver cirrhosis, aiming to summarize and delineate the present status and constraints associated with the application of traditional prognostic tools in clinical settings. Among these tools, the Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring systems are predominantly utilized. However, their accuracy varies significantly. These systems are generally suitable for broad assessments but lack condition-specific applicability and fail to capture the risks associated with dynamic changes in patient conditions. Future research in this field is poised for deep exploration into the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with routine clinical and multi-omics data in patients with cirrhosis. The goal is to transition from static, unimodal assessment models to dynamic, multimodal frameworks. Such advancements will not only improve the precision of prognostic tools but also facilitate personalized medicine approaches, potentially revolutionizing clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.