Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39402630›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2024

Artificial intelligence-based evaluation of prognosis in cirrhosis.

Yinping Zhai, Darong Hai, Li Zeng, Chenyan Lin, Xinru Tan, Zefei Mo, Qijia Tao, Wenhui Li, Xiaowei Xu, Qi Zhao and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yinping Zhai *Department of Gastroenterology Nursing Unit, Ward 192, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Darong Hai *The School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Li Zeng *The Second Clinical Medical College of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Chenyan LinThe School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Xinru TanThe First School of Medicine, School of Information and Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Zefei MoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Qijia TaoThe School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Wenhui LiThe School of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Xiaowei XuDepartment of Gastroenterology Nursing Unit, Ward 192, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Qi ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, 114051, China. zhaoqi@lnu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-9713-1864
Jianwei ShuaiWenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou, 325000, China. shuaijw@wiucas.ac.cn.
Jingye PanDepartment of Big Data in Health Science, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China. panjingye@wzhospital.ac.cn.

Funding

5G Network-based Platform for Precision Emergency Medical Care in Regional Hospital Clusters funded by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China 2020-78National Natural Science Foundation of China 12090052National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272204Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province 2023-MS-288"Pioneer" and "Leading Goose" R&D Program of Zhejiang 2023C03084Science and Technology Bureau Project of Wenzhou Y20220505Science and Technology Bureau Project of Wenzhou Y2023729The Key Clinical Specialty Program of the Zhejiang Province of Critical Care Medicine Y2022the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2021ZD0201900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cirrhosis represents a significant global health challenge, characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates that severely impact human health. Timely and precise prognostic assessments of liver cirrhosis are crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing mortality rates as they enable physicians to identify high-risk patients and implement early interventions. This paper features a thorough literature review on the prognostic assessment of liver cirrhosis, aiming to summarize and delineate the present status and constraints associated with the application of traditional prognostic tools in clinical settings. Among these tools, the Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring systems are predominantly utilized. However, their accuracy varies significantly. These systems are generally suitable for broad assessments but lack condition-specific applicability and fail to capture the risks associated with dynamic changes in patient conditions. Future research in this field is poised for deep exploration into the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with routine clinical and multi-omics data in patients with cirrhosis. The goal is to transition from static, unimodal assessment models to dynamic, multimodal frameworks. Such advancements will not only improve the precision of prognostic tools but also facilitate personalized medicine approaches, potentially revolutionizing clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLiver CirrhosisHumansPrognosisArtificial intelligenceCirrhosisMachine learningMarkersPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39402630
PMCPMC11475999

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.