ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2024
Dissociation Energies via Embedding Techniques.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the large number of interactions, evaluating interaction energies for large or periodic systems results in time-consuming calculations. Prime examples are liquids, adsorbates, and molecular crystals. Thus, there is a high demand for a cheap but still accurate method to determine interaction energies and gradients. One approach to counteract the computational cost is to fragment a large cluster into smaller subsystems, sometimes called many-body expansion, with the fragments being molecules or parts thereof. These subsystems can then be embedded into larger entities, representing the bigger system. In this work, we test several subsystem approaches and explore their limits and behaviors, determined by calculations of trimer interaction energies. The methods presented here encompass mechanical embedding, point charges, polarizable embedding, polarizable density embedding, and density embedding. We evaluate nonembedded fragmentation, QM/MM (quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics), and QM/QM (quantum mechanics/quantum mechanics) embedding theories. Finally, we make use of symmetry-adapted perturbation theory utilizing density functional theory for the monomers to interpret the results. Depending on the strength of the interaction, different embedding methods and schemes prove favorable to accurately describe a system. The embedding approaches presented here are able to decrease the interaction energy errors with respect to full system calculations by a factor of up to 20 in comparison to simple/unembedded approaches, leading to errors below 0.1 kJ/mol.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.