ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Prediction Model for in-Stent Restenosis Post-PCI Based on Boruta Algorithm and Deep Learning: The Role of Blood Cholesterol and Lymphocyte Ratio.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning unveils non-linear inflammatory thresholds and synergistic interactions in post-burn hypertrophic scarring: development of an intelligent clinical decision support system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cholesterol-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of 1-Year Unplanned Readmission in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics Combined With Biological Experiments to Identify the Pathogenetic Link of Type 2 Diabetes for Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Remnant Cholesterol Inflammatory Index for Predicting Heart Failure Risk in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Study Using Multiple Machine Learning Approaches.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the primary treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a significant limitation to the efficacy of PCI. The cholesterol-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), a novel biomarker associated with inflammation and dyslipidemia, may have predictive value for ISR. Deep learning-based models, such as the multilayer perceptron (MLP), can aid in establishing predictive models for ISR using CLR. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical and laboratory data from 1967 patients. The Boruta algorithm was employed to identify key features associated with ISR. An MLP model was developed and divided into training and validation sets. Model performance was evaluated using ROC curves and calibration plots. Results: Patients in the ISR group exhibited significantly higher levels of CLR and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) compared to the non-ISR group. The Boruta algorithm identified 21 important features for subsequent modeling. The MLP model achieved an AUC of 0.95 on the validation set and 0.63 on the test set, indicating good predictive performance. Calibration plots demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. Feature importance analysis revealed that the number of initial stent implants, hemoglobin levels, Gensini score, CLR, and white blood cell count were significant predictors of ISR. Partial dependence plots (PDP) confirmed CLR as a key predictor for ISR. Conclusion: The CLR, as a biomarker that integrates lipid metabolism and inflammation, shows significant potential in predicting coronary ISR. The MLP model, based on deep learning, demonstrated robust predictive capabilities, offering new insights and strategies for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.