ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2024
Electronic Consultations for Endocrine Conditions: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glycemic Outcomes of Endocrinology Consultation for Type 2 Diabetes by Visit Modality: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- Adequacy of electronic and in-person referrals to endocrinology: a prospective study of primary care and hospital consultations.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic consultations (e-consults) are a mode of referral increasingly used to provide access to endocrine specialty care without the need for a patient in-person visit. This scoping review aimed to describe the models being used to deliver endocrine care via e-consult, what is known about outcomes of endocrine e-consult, and research gaps. The review was completed using an established methodological framework. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched for articles published in English between January 1, 2000, and March 21, 2024, that reported on e-consults for endocrine specialty care. The database search yielded 2522 articles, of which 19 underwent data extraction and synthesis. The overall body of endocrine e-consult literature is small and largely observational. Various models for endocrine e-consult programs exist. Findings on feasibility, acceptability, and timeliness are positive and consistent with the larger body of e-consult literature. Data on outcomes are limited but suggest that e-consults are no worse than other referral approaches to lowering A1C. Improvements in outcomes are greater for patients whose primary care providers implement e-consult recommendations. In summary, existing studies support the benefits of e-consults in various aspects of endocrine care quality, but the literature is nascent and there are significant research gaps. Future research should examine how e-consults can best address specific endocrine conditions, with a broad set of outcomes that addresses multiple quality dimensions. Advanced study designs and qualitative methods can help address unresolved questions about e-consults relevant to all specialties, including impact on care coordination and costs and best practices for reimbursement and workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.