ArticleDigital health
Podcasts as a tool for promoting health-related behaviours: A scoping review.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preferences of Female Triathletes and Their Coaches for Education on REDs: A Qualitative Study.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Gentle Mind-A Podcast on Self-Compassion and Character Strengths to Enhance Well-Being in University Students: A Controlled Feasibility Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Listening to Learn: What Breast Cancer Podcasts Teach Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Time to listen: harnessing podcasts for stakeholder engagement in circadian and sleep science.Npj biological timing and sleep · 2026Article
- Exploring the effectiveness of podcasts in improving sexual health among young people: Findings from a qualitative study.PloS one · 2026Article
- The effectiveness of podcasts in promoting health among young people: a scoping review.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- The impact of podcast-based interventions on mental health: A systematic scoping review.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
- The impact of an educational podcast on emotional wellbeing and attitudes towards Charles Bonnet syndrome hallucinations.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
- Podcast-driven insights into Charles Bonnet Syndrome: Impact on self-management strategies and communication.Digital healthArticle
- Cannabis Use Behaviors and Desired Interventions Among Postpartum Individuals With Frequent Cannabis Use in Early Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study.Journal of addiction medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Podcasts are a popular medium for delivering health-related content, potentially influencing physical and mental health behaviours and outcomes. This scoping review evaluates the impact of health podcasts on such outcomes, engagement levels, and public perceptions. Methods: This scoping review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Qualitative or quantitative articles published from 2004 onward were included. Eligibility criteria were developed using the Population, Exposure and Outcome framework. Included articles examined the use, engagement with, or perspectives towards health-related podcasts. Data were synthesised narratively. Results: Fifty articles encompassing 38 studies were analysed. Significant improvements ( Conclusion: Podcasts show promise as effective tools for health promotion, achieving strong engagement and effects on knowledge and behaviours. Future research should explore content innovation and integration into health interventions, and long-term effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.