Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39403769›Full record

ReviewAnalytical methods : advancing methods and applications2024

3D printed microfluidic devices with electrodes for electrochemical analysis.

Major A Selemani, Khamhbawihum Cenhrang, Samuel Azibere, Mariama Singhateh, R Scott Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Major A SelemaniDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, USA. scott.martin@slu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2511-1316
Khamhbawihum CenhrangDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, USA. scott.martin@slu.edu.
Samuel AzibereDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, USA. scott.martin@slu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-7643
Mariama SinghatehDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, USA. scott.martin@slu.edu.
R Scott MartinDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, USA. scott.martin@slu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6952-1408

Funding

From single molecule to microfluidic 3D tissue platforms: novel multiscale tools to investigate hyper-stimulated immune cells in the circulationR01NS105888 · NINDS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Lane A. Baker, ROBERT Scott MARTIN · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A review with 93 references describing various 3D printing approaches that have been used to create microfluidic devices containing electrodes for electrochemical detection. The use of 3D printing to fabricate microfluidic devices is a rapidly growing area. One significant research area is how to detect analytes in the devices for quantitation purposes. This review article is focused on methods used to integrate electrodes into the devices for electrochemical detection. The review is organized in terms of the methodology for integrating the electrode within the device. This includes (1) external coupling of traditional electrode materials with 3D printed devices; (2) printing conductive electrode materials as part of device printing; and (3) integrating traditional electrodes into the device as part of the print process. Example applications are given and some future directions are also outlined.

Identifiers

PMID39403769
PMCPMC12359143

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.