Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39405515›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Exploring Physicians' Perceptions of Digital Health's Impact on the Patient-Physician Relationship in the Primary Health Care Setting: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Kai Ping Sze, Qi Wei Fong, Jacqueline Giovanna De Roza, Eng Sing Lee, Shu Yun Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Atencion primaria · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Family and community medicine workforce training and practice in the Americas.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kai Ping SzeNational Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0005-3377-1973
Qi Wei FongNational Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3424-8915
Jacqueline Giovanna De RozaNational Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2774-5411
Eng Sing LeeNational Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4963-535X
Shu Yun TanNational Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0307-9546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health has become essential for effective clinical practice. However, the successful adoption of digital health is dependent on the strength of the patient-physician relationship. The patient-physician relationship shapes the quality of care and impacts health care outcomes, especially in primary care. However, the impact of the increasing use of digital health on the patient-physician relationship is uncertain.

objectiveThis study aims to explore the types of digital health primary care physicians use and understand their impact on the patient-physician relationship from their perspective.

methodsThis exploratory qualitative descriptive study used individual in-depth interviews guided by a semistructured topic guide. We purposively sampled physicians from 6 general primary care clinics in Singapore and used thematic analysis to identify emergent themes.

resultsWe conducted 12 interviews. We found that primary care physicians in Singapore had minimal exposure to digital health beyond the scope of institutional implementation. The three key themes that emerged were as follows: (1) evolving roles of both physicians and patients; (2) impact on trust, knowledge acquisition, and longitudinal care; and (3) adoption and use factors of digital health impacting patient-physician relationships. The adoption and use factors comprised "social and personal," "technical and material," and "organization and policy" factors.

conclusionsThe study identified that, while primary care physicians held mostly positive views on adopting digital health in improving the patient-physician relationship, they were concerned that digital health might erode trust, hinder proper knowledge acquisition, and reduce humanistic interaction. These concerns called for a nuanced approach to ensure that digital health would not compromise the patient-physician relationship. This could be achieved by ensuring that physicians possess the necessary skills, knowledge, and positive attitude, while health care organizations would provide robust IT capabilities and support. We recommend that education be refined and government policies on digital health adoption and use be revised to align with the goal of strengthening the patient-physician relationship.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansPhysicians, Primary CareSingaporeTrustdigital healthimplementationlongitudinal carepatient communicationpatient-physician relationshippolicyprimary careprimary care medicinetrust

Identifiers

PMID39405515
PMCPMC11522646

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.