ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2024
Maternal periconception hyperglycemia, preconception diabetes, and risk of major congenital malformations in offspring.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Craniofacial development: genetics, signaling pathways, teratogenic mechanisms, and clinal significance.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- First-trimester nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs exposure and risk of major congenital malformations: A retrospective register-based cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Congenital Muscular Torticollis as a Potential Neonatal Marker of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Other Neurodevelopmental Conditions.Research in autism · 2026Article
- Maternal Immune Activation: Implications for Congenital Heart Defects.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
study questionWhat are the roles of maternal preconception diabetes and related periconceptional hyperglycemia on the risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) in offspring? SUMMARY ANSWER: Maternal periconceptional glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels over 5.6% were associated with an increased risk of congenital heart defects (CHD) in the offspring, and maternal preconception diabetes was associated with an increased risk of CHD, including when HbA1c levels were within euglycemic ranges. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Maternal preconception diabetes has been linked with MCMs in the offspring. However, evidence concerning associations with specific periconception serum measures of hyperglycemia, and susceptibility of different organ systems, is inconsistent. Moreover, limited evidence exists concerning the effectiveness of antidiabetic medications in mitigating diabetes-related teratogenic risks. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A large Israeli birth cohort of 46 534 children born in 2001-2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsMaternal HbA1c test results were obtained from 90 days before conception to mid-pregnancy. Maternal diabetes, other cardiometabolic conditions, and MCMs in newborns were ascertained based on clinical diagnoses, medication dispensing records, and laboratory test results using previously validated algorithms. Associations were modeled using generalized additive logistic regression models with thin plate penalized splines. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Maternal periconceptional HbA1c value was associated with CHD in newborns, with the risk starting to increase at HbA1c values exceeding 5.6%. The association between HbA1c and CHD was stronger among mothers with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared to the other diabetes groups. Maternal pre-existing T2DM was associated with CHD even after accounting for HbA1C levels and other cardiometabolic comorbidities (odds ratio (OR)=1.89, 95% CI 1.18, 3.03); and the OR was materially unchanged when only mothers with pre-existing T2DM who had high adherence to antidiabetic medications and normal HbA1c levels were considered. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The rarity of some specific malformation groups limited the ability to conduct more granular analyses. The use of HbA1c as a time-aggregated measure of glycemic control may miss transient glycemic dysregulation that could be clinically meaningful for teratogenic risks. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThe observed association between pre-existing diabetes and the risk of malformations within HbA1c levels suggests underlying causal pathways that are partly independent of maternal glucose control. Therefore, treatments for hyperglycemia might not completely mitigate the teratogenic risk associated with maternal preconception diabetes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The work was supported by NIH grants K99ES035433, R01HD097778, and P30ES000002. None of the authors reports competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.