Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39406514›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Oscillatory Brain Activity in the Canonical Alpha-Band Conceals Distinct Mechanisms in Attention.

Gabriela Cruz, María Melcón, Leonardo Sutandi, J Matias Palva, Satu Palva, Gregor Thut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriela CruzSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom cruz.gabriela@gmail.com gregor.thut@glasgow.ac.uk.
María MelcónSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom.
Leonardo SutandiSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-5678-8120
J Matias PalvaSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom.
Satu PalvaSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9496-7391
Gregor ThutSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom cruz.gabriela@gmail.com gregor.thut@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1313-4262

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V003623/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain oscillations in the alpha-band (8-14 Hz) have been linked to specific processes in attention and perception. In particular, decreases in posterior alpha-amplitude are thought to reflect activation of perceptually relevant brain areas for target engagement, while alpha-amplitude increases have been associated with inhibition for distractor suppression. Traditionally, these alpha-changes have been viewed as two facets of the same process. However, recent evidence calls for revisiting this interpretation. Here, we recorded MEG/EEG in 32 participants (19 females) during covert visuospatial attention shifts (spatial cues) and two control conditions (neutral cue, no-attention cue), while tracking fixational eye movements. In disagreement with a single, perceptually relevant alpha-process, we found the typical alpha-modulations contra- and ipsilateral to the attention focus to be triple dissociated in their timing, topography, and spectral features: Ipsilateral alpha-increases occurred early, over occipital sensors, at a high alpha-frequency (10-14 Hz) and were expressed during spatial attention (alpha spatial cue > neutral cue). In contrast, contralateral alpha-decreases occurred later, over parietal sensors, at a lower alpha-frequency (7-10 Hz) and were associated with attention deployment in general (alpha spatial and neutral cue < no-attention cue). Additionally, the lateralized early alpha-increases but not alpha-decreases during spatial attention coincided in time with directionally biased microsaccades. Overall, this suggests that the attention-related early alpha-increases and late alpha-decreases reflect distinct, likely reflexive versus endogenously controlled attention mechanisms. We conclude that there is more than one perceptually relevant posterior alpha-oscillation, which need to be dissociated for a detailed account of their roles in perception and attention.

Indexed as

Alpha RhythmAttentionMagnetoencephalographyAdultBrainCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adultalpha-oscillationsattentionEEG/MEGmicrosaccadestemporal expectationvisuospatial orienting

Identifiers

PMID39406514
PMCPMC11694399

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.