ArticleScientific reports2024
Evaluation of particle tracking codes for dispersing particles in porous media.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Quantification of the Electro-Osmotic Flow Field in an Irregular Porous Medium and Its Consequences for Dewatering.Industrial & engineering chemistry research · 2026Article
- Deep learning in chromatin organization: from super-resolution microscopy to clinical applications.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Particle tracking (PT) is a popular technique in microscopy, microfluidics and colloidal transport studies, where image analysis is used to reconstruct trajectories from bright spots in a video. The performance of many PT algorithms has been rigorously tested for directed and Brownian motion in open media. However, PT is frequently used to track particles in porous media where complex geometries and viscous flows generate particles with high velocity variability over time. Here, we present an evaluation of four PT algorithms for a simulated dispersion of particles in porous media across a range of particle speeds and densities. Of special note, we introduce a new velocity-based PT linking algorithm (V-TrackMat) that achieves high accuracy relative to the other PT algorithms. Our findings underscore that traditional statistics, which revolve around detection and linking proficiency, fall short in providing a holistic comparison of PT codes because they tend to underpenalize aggressive linking techniques. We further elucidate that all codes analyzed show a decrease in performance due to high speeds, particle densities, and trajectory noise. However, linking algorithms designed to harness velocity data show superior performance, especially in the case of high-speed advective motion. Lastly, we emphasize how PT error can influence transport analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.