Trial reportNutrients2024
The Satiating Effect of Extruded Plant Protein Compared with Native Plant and Meat Protein in a Ragú "Bolognaise" Meal: A Randomized Cross-Over Study.
Trial report in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein increases satiety by, among other things, increasing the content of certain amino acids in the blood. Plant proteins generally have a lower digestibility than meat proteins. The digestibility increases after extrusion; thereby, extrusion potentially also increases the satiating effect. We investigated subjective appetite and ad libitum energy intake (adlib_EI) following ragú "bolognaise" meals with three different protein sources. We hypothesized that the satiating effect of texturized vegetable proteins (TVP) was comparable to that of animal protein (Meat) and that TVPs would have a stronger satiating effect than non-texturized legume proteins (Green). Test meals were theoretically designed to be similar in weight, energy (kJ), macronutrients and fiber. The in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD) and the amino acid composition were analyzed. A randomized, single-blinded, three-way, cross-over study including 25 healthy men was carried out. There were no significant differences between the three meals in terms of subjective appetite. The adlib_EI was significantly lower after the TVP meal (758 kJ) than after the Meat meal (957 kJ), with the Green meal in between (903 kJ). The IVPD was significantly higher in the Meat meal (30.72%) than in the Green meal (20.17%), with the TVP meal in between (21.05%). In conclusion, the TVP meal had a higher long-term satiating effect than a similar meal with meat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.