Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39408377›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Risk Factors for a Higher Dietary Acid Load (Potential Renal Acid Load) in Free-Living Elderly in Poland.

Katarzyna Rolf, Olga Januszko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katarzyna RolfDepartment of Food Technology and Human Nutrition, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 4 Street, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-289X
Olga JanuszkoDepartment of Human Nutrition, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c Street, 02-787 Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4768-4812

Funding

National Science Center 2019/03/X/NZ9/00854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary composition is one of the factors influencing the acid-base balance of the body by providing acid or base precursors. One of the methods for assessing the acid-forming potential of a diet is to calculate its potential renal acid load (PRAL). The aim of this study was to identify the sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health factors related to the PRAL.

methodsDietary intake was assessed among 133 individuals aged 70+ years using the three-day record method.

resultsThe average PRAL value was 15.7 mEq/day (range from -42.4 to +101.7). The diets of a majority of the participants (71.4%) had acid-forming potential (PRAL > 0). From a univariate analysis, the acid-forming potential of the diets was linked mainly to women (65.3% in PRAL > 0 group vs. 10.5% in PRAL < 0 group), people using dietary supplements, those who consumed alcohol, those who assessed their health as being at least good, people with osteoporosis, those hospitalized during the previous year, and those with rather lower physical activity.

conclusionsFrom a multivariate analysis, gender was the strongest predictor of an acid-forming diet, but the following also contributed: an average self-rated health status (compared to good), a good health status (compared to poor), alcohol drinking, hospitalization, lack of nutritional knowledge, and, to a lesser extent, non-frail status (compared to pre-frail). Therefore, more extensive nutritional education in the identified groups is required.

Indexed as

DietAcid-Base EquilibriumAcidsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth StatusHumansIndependent LivingKidneyLife StyleMalePolandRisk FactorsSex FactorsAcidsdietary acid loadelderlyfrailty syndromepotential renal acid loadPRAL

Identifiers

PMID39408377
PMCPMC11478483

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.