Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409072›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Diagnostic Utility of Copeptin in Pediatric Patients with Polyuria-Polydipsia Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Diana-Andreea Ciortea, Carmen Loredana Petrea Cliveți, Laura Bujoreanu Bezman, Iolanda Cristina Vivisenco, Sorin Ion Berbece, Gabriela Gurău, Mădălina Nicoleta Matei, Aurel Nechita

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Copeptin in the diagnosis and management of renal tubular disorders.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diana-Andreea CiorteaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University "Dunarea de Jos" of Galati, 800201 Galati, Romania.
Carmen Loredana Petrea ClivețiFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University "Dunarea de Jos" of Galati, 800201 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0009-0001-8838-8817
Laura Bujoreanu BezmanFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University "Dunarea de Jos" of Galati, 800201 Galati, Romania.
Iolanda Cristina VivisencoFaculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 030167 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0005-8529-8022
Sorin Ion BerbeceFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University "Dunarea de Jos" of Galati, 800201 Galati, Romania.
Gabriela GurăuFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University "Dunarea de Jos" of Galati, 800201 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8327-1364
Mădălina Nicoleta MateiFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University "Dunarea de Jos" of Galati, 800201 Galati, Romania.
Aurel NechitaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University "Dunarea de Jos" of Galati, 800201 Galati, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric patients with polyuria polydipsia syndrome (PPS) represent a diagnostic challenge for clinicians because of the technical difficulties in performing the gold standard water deprivation test (WDT). Copeptin, a stable biomarker representing the C-terminal portion of the polypeptide chain of the antidiuretic hormone, is a reliable diagnostic tool. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of baseline copeptin dosing, arginine/hypertonic saline copeptin stimulation tests, and WDT. This study aimed to establish the diagnostic utility of copeptin in pediatric patients by distinguishing between central diabetes insipidus, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, and primary polydipsia. Comparative and non-comparative primary studies published between January 2018 and August 2024 focusing on children were searched and included in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analyses used fixed effects models because of low heterogeneity and the HSROC model. Eleven studies were included with an overall low bias and no significant applicability concerns. The mean pooled sensitivity = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.936-1.025), pooled specificity = 0.947 (95% CI: 0.920-0.973), and AUC = 0.972 (95% CI: 0.952-0.992), indicating excellent diagnostic accuracy. Stimulation methods for copeptin dosing represent an effective and less invasive diagnostic test for children with PPS, and future development of standard copeptin testing protocols is needed.

Indexed as

BiomarkersGlycopeptidesPolydipsiaPolyuriaChildDiabetes Insipidus, NephrogenicDiabetes Insipidus, NeurogenicDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansBiomarkerscopeptinsGlycopeptidescopeptindiagnostic accuracypediatricspolyuria-polydipsia syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39409072
PMCPMC11477532

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.