Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39409976›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Modular Universal Tumor and Revision System Prostheses in Patients with Bone Cancer of the Lower Limbs: A Narrative Review of Functional Outcomes.

Paola E Ferrara, Mariantonietta Ariani, Sefora Codazza, Adelaide Aprovitola, Daniele Polisano, Gianpaolo Ronconi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paola E FerraraDepartment of Aging, Orthopedic and Rheumatological Sciences, University Polyclinic Foundation A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00100 Rome, Italy.
Mariantonietta ArianiDepartment of Neurosciences, Sense Organs and Thorax, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00100 Rome, Italy.
Sefora CodazzaDepartment of Aging, Orthopedic and Rheumatological Sciences, University Polyclinic Foundation A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00100 Rome, Italy.
Adelaide AprovitolaDepartment of Neurosciences, Sense Organs and Thorax, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00100 Rome, Italy.
Daniele PolisanoPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00100 Rome, Italy.
Gianpaolo RonconiDepartment of Aging, Orthopedic and Rheumatological Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00100 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal management of bone tumors requires a multidisciplinary strategy to guarantee high-quality care. At specialized centers, the medical team responsible for managing patients with bone cancer comprises oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, pathologists, and rehabilitation specialists. The goal of treatment is to achieve long-term survival with minimal disability and pain. Postoperative rehabilitation is a fundamental therapeutic approach to enhance functionality and sustain the utmost quality of life following a limb-sparing surgery. Currently, megaprostheses are used for reconstructing bone defects after tumor resection, but in the literature, only a few studies have investigated rehabilitation outcomes in terms of functionality and impact on daily activities. This narrative review explores the functional and quality of life outcomes after the implantation of MUTARS

Indexed as

bone oncologymegaprothesisMUTARSrehabilitations

Identifiers

PMID39409976
PMCPMC11476175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.