ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024
Causal relationship between serum uric acid and cardiovascular disease: A Mendelian randomization study.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genetic susceptibility to uric acid and selected cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Comprehensive Review on Febuxostat for Hyperuricemia with Gout: Insights from Current Practice and Clinical Trials.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Transcriptomics and Mendelian randomization studies reveal the critical role of Stanniocalcin-2 in linking perfluorinated compound-exposure to colorectal cancer.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Multi-omics study of mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of hyperuricemia.Renal failure · 2025Article
- The role of insulin resistance in the relationship between uric acid and the severity of coronary artery disease: evidence from real-world data.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Observational studies have established an association between serum uric acid and cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, these studies are susceptible to uncontrolled confounders and reverse causality bias. To overcome these challenges, we employed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to investigate the causal link between serum uric acid and CVD. Methods: We utilized Genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for serum uric acid and six CVD: coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), angina, and coronary heart disease (CHD). MR analyses employed inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess result reliability, including Cochrane's Q test, MR-Egger intercept, MR-PRESSO, and the leave-one-out approach. Results: IVW analysis revealed that a genetic predisposition to elevated serum uric acid levels significantly increases the risk of CVD, with higher odds ratios (ORs) observed for CAD (OR: 1.227; 95 % CI: 1.107-1.360, Conclusion: This MR study robustly demonstrates a significant causal relationship between genetically elevated serum uric acid and various cardiovascular diseases, suggesting that higher levels may enhance the risk of cardiovascular events. Consequently, patients with elevated uric acid levels warrant early and aggressive interventions to mitigate cardiovascular risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.