Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411269›Full record

ReviewJournal of tissue engineering

Scaffold-mediated liver regeneration: A comprehensive exploration of current advances.

Supriya Bhatt S, Jayanthi Krishna Kumar, Shurthi Laya, Goutam Thakur, Manasa Nune

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Supriya Bhatt SManipal Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Bengaluru, India.
Jayanthi Krishna KumarManipal Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Bengaluru, India.
Shurthi LayaManipal Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Bengaluru, India.
Goutam ThakurDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Manasa NuneManipal Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5328-5693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liver coordinates over 500 biochemical processes crucial for maintaining homeostasis, detoxification, and metabolism. Its specialized cells, arranged in hexagonal lobules, enable it to function as a highly efficient metabolic engine. However, diseases such as cirrhosis, fatty liver disease, and hepatitis present significant global health challenges. Traditional drug development is expensive and often ineffective at predicting human responses, driving interest in advanced in vitro liver models utilizing 3D bioprinting and microfluidics. These models strive to mimic the liver's complex microenvironment, improving drug screening and disease research. Despite its resilience, the liver is vulnerable to chronic illnesses, injuries, and cancers, leading to millions of deaths annually. Organ shortages hinder liver transplantation, highlighting the need for alternative treatments. Tissue engineering, employing polymer-based scaffolds and 3D bioprinting, shows promise. This review examines these innovative strategies, including liver organoids and liver tissue-on-chip technologies, to address the challenges of liver diseases.

Indexed as

3D bioprinting3D scaffoldsbioinkhepatic organoidshydrogels

Identifiers

PMID39411269
PMCPMC11475092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.