Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39411999›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2025

Self-Advocacy Among Black Women During the Perinatal Period: Prevalence and Relationship to Patient Experiences.

Teresa Hagan Thomas, Savannah Vetterly, Elizabeth B Kaselitz, Willa Doswell, Betty Braxter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Teresa Hagan ThomasDepartment of Health Promotion and Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7403-7314
Savannah VetterlyStritch School of Medicine, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Elizabeth B KaselitzUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Willa DoswellDepartment of Health Promotion and Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Betty BraxterDepartment of Health Promotion and Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Maternal/Perinatal and Reproductive Health Research HUB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBlack women experience many barriers to receiving high-quality maternal healthcare. The ability of Black women to self-advocate may mitigate these threats to their health. Limited research describes Black women's self-advocacy during the perinatal period and how self-advocacy related to other relevant concepts. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between self-advocacy, patient-provider relationships, and mental health outcomes among Black women in the perinatal period.

methodsThis cross-sectional descriptive pilot study recruited Black women who were either in their 3

resultsN = 40 participants were recruited between January and September 2022. Participants reported moderate levels of self-advocacy which were associated with trust and comfort with healthcare providers (r = 0.57-0.76, p < 0.001). Feeling respected by healthcare providers was positively associated with two self-advocacy subscales (r = 0.42-0.44, p < 0.01). Depression was inversely related to all self-advocacy subscales (r = -0.47-0.62, p < 0.001).

conclusionBlack women's self-advocacy during the perinatal period is associated with trust and comfort with healthcare providers, perceptions of respect from their providers, and perinatal depression. Future research should focus on promoting trusting, respectful relationships between Black women and their maternal health providers.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanPerinatal CareProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancyPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesTrustYoung Adultmaternal healthpatient‐centered careracial inequitiesself‐advocacy

Identifiers

PMID39411999
PMCPMC12060632

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.