ArticlePloS one2024
The value of using COVID-19 antibody tests as a potential approach to prioritize vaccination delivery.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe highly contagious novel COVID-19 virus has demonstrated a great challenge for healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide. One of these challenges is the availability of vaccines in some countries or societies, especially in the early stages of the pandemic.
objectivesThis study aims to determine the level of natural immunity against COVID-19 infection among HCWs exposed to COVID-19 at the early stages of the pandemic and build a model to determine the groups that can benefit more from the scarce vaccination resources.
methodsThis study took place between January and March 2021, after the first waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, before spreading the variants of concern, such as the UK variant (Alpha B.1.1.7), and before starting the vaccine campaigns. This cross-sectional study collected serum samples from 251 vulnerable HCWs. The samples were tested for IgG antibodies against COVID-19 using commercial kits. The demographics and clinical characteristics of the participants were recorded using face-to-face interviews.
resultsCOVID-19 IgG antibodies were detected in more than 40% of HCWs before vaccination. Those HCWs should have less priority than those without COVID-19 IgG. The seroprevalence of COVID-19 was higher in male HCWs and among nurses. There was no association between the participants' immunity and smoking status or different blood groups. Most HCWs reported being infected with the virus during the first wave, mainly at the end of 2020. A limited number of HCWs reported infections between January 2021 and March 2021. All HCWs eventually received the COVID-19 vaccine, ignoring being previously infected.
conclusionThe reported results emphasize the value of using immunity tests to prioritize the groups that may benefit the most from the limited vaccines, especially in developing countries with scarce resources where those with COVID-19 IgG antibodies should have less priority for the COVID-19 vaccine. The present results indicate that up to 40% of the delivered vaccines to HCWs who had COVID-19 antibodies could be prioritized more wisely in future pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.