ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2024
Multi-omics PGT: re-evaluation of euploid blastocysts for implantation potential based on RNA sequencing.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endometriosis at the Single-Cell Level: Molecular Insights and Implications for Assisted Reproduction Success.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Transcriptomics empower assisted reproductive technology in decoding gamete and embryo development potential: a review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- MicroRNAs Secreted by the Embryo in Spent Culture Medium Can Regulate mRNAs Involved in Endometrial Receptivity, Embryo Attachment, and Invasion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Micro magnetic resonance spectroscopy for noninvasive metabolic screening of mammalian embryos and oocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Noninvasive Biomarkers of Human Embryo Developmental Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Association between hatching status and pregnancy outcomes in single blastocyst transfers: a retrospective cohort analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- The clinical application and challenges of preimplantation genetic testing.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
study questionIn addition to chromosomal euploidy, can the transcriptome of blastocysts be used as a novel predictor of embryo implantation potential? SUMMARY ANSWER: This retrospective analysis showed that based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between euploid blastocysts which resulted and did not result in a clinical pregnancy, machine learning models could help improve implantation rates by blastocyst optimization. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Embryo implantation is a multifaceted process, with implantation loss and pregnancy failure related not only to blastocyst euploidy but also to the intricate dialog between blastocyst and endometrium. Although in vitro studies have revealed the characteristics of trophectoderm (TE) differentiation in implanted blastocysts and the function of TE placentation at the implantation site, the precise molecular mechanisms of embryo implantation and their clinical application remain to be fully elucidated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study involved 102 patients who underwent 111 cycles for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) between March 2022 and July 2023. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsThe study included 412 blastocysts biopsied at Day 5 [D5] or Day 6 [D6] for patients who underwent PGT-A. The biopsy lysates were split and subjected to DNA and RNA sequencing (DNA- and RNA-seq). One part was used for PGT-A to detect DNA copy number variations, whereas the other part was assessed simultaneously by RNA-seq to determine the transcriptome characteristics. To validate the reliability and accuracy of RNA-seq obtained from this strategy, we initially analyzed the transcriptome of blastocysts with chromosomal aneuploidies. Subsequently, we compared the transcriptomic features of blastocysts with different rates of formation (D5 vs D6) and investigated the network of interactions between key blastulation genes and the receptive endometrium. Then to evaluate the implantation potential of euploid blastocysts, we identified DEGs between euploid blastocysts that resulted in clinical pregnancy (defined as the presence of a gestational sac detected by ultrasound after 5 weeks) and those that did not. These DEGs were then employed to construct a predictive model for optimizing blastocyst selection. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The successful detection rate of PGT-A was remarkably high at 99.8%. The RNA data may infer aneuploidy for both trisomy and monosomy. Between the euploid blastocysts that formed on D5 and D6, 187 DEGs were predominantly involved in cell differentiation for embryonic placenta development, the PPAR signaling pathway, and the Notch signaling pathway. These D5/D6 DEGs also exhibited a functional dialog with the receptive phase endometrium-specific genes through protein-protein interaction networks, indicating that the embryo undergoes further differentiation for post-implantation development. Furthermore, a modeling strategy using 280 DEGs between blastocysts leading to successful clinical pregnancies or failing to produce clinical pregnancies was implemented to refine the euploid embryo optimization, achieving areas under the curves of 0.88, 0.71, and 0.84 for the random forest (RF), support vector machine, and linear discriminant analysis models, respectively. Finally, a retrospective analysis of 83 transferred euploid blastocysts using the RF model identified three types of euploid embryos with a decreasing trend in implantation potential. Notably, the implantation rate of the good group was significantly higher than that of the moderate group (88.6% vs 50.0% P = 0.001) and that of the moderate group was higher than that of the poor group (50.0% vs 20.8%, P = 0.035). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size was insufficient; thus, a prospective study is needed to verify the clinical effectiveness of the above model. Because we did not analyze blastocysts that led only to biochemical pregnancies but failed clinical pregnancies separately, our classification system still must be modified to screen these embryos. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsTranscriptomic analysis of blastocysts offers a novel approach for predicting embryo implantation potential, which can be utilized to optimize clinical embryo selection. The ranking system may be effective in reducing the times and costs involved in achieving a clinical pregnancy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the "Pioneer" and "Leading Goose" R&D Program of Zhejiang (No. 2023C03034), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82101709), and the National Key Research and Development Program for Young Scientists of China (No. 2022YFC2702300). The authors state no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.