ArticleBMJ open2024
High-load strength training compared with standard care treatment in young adults with joint hypermobility and knee pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the HIPEr-Knee study).
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06277401 (High-load Resistance Training Compared With Usual Care for Treatment of Painful Knee Joint Hypermobility in Young Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
High-load Resistance Training Compared With Usual Care for Treatment of Painful Knee Joint Hypermobility in Young Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial (the HIPEr-Knee Study)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimizing resistance training for pain management in knee and hip osteoarthritis: a pairwise and dose-response meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence of Pain and Effect of Joint Strength on Perceived Physical Function in Pediatric Patients With Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with generalised joint hypermobility, including knee hypermobility (GJHk), often experience knee pain and are typically managed with low-intensity strength training and/or proprioceptive training as part of standard care. However, not all patients experience satisfactory outcomes. High-load strength training may offer additional benefits, such as increased muscle cross-sectional area, neural drive and tendon stiffness, which may reduce pain and improve active knee joint stability during movement tasks and daily activities. So far, no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have compared high-load strength training with traditional treatment strategies (standard care) for this patient group. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this RCT, we aim to recruit patients with GJHk and knee pain from primary care physiotherapy clinics in the Region of Southern Denmark and via social media. Patients with competing injuries or experience with high-load strength training will be excluded. Patients will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to either 2 weekly sessions of high-load strength training or standard care for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is self-reported knee pain during an activity nominated by the patient as the most aggravating for their present knee pain measured using the Visual Analogue Scale for Nominated Activity (VAS ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was funded by Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant number 2034-00088B) on 14 June 2022; the Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark approved it (S-20230050) on 30 August 2023. The first recruitment site opened on 15 February 2024, and the final results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal to inform rehabilitation strategies for symptomatic GJHk.Protocol version 1, dated 4 July 2024. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06277401.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.