Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39414697›Full record

ReviewLearning & behavior2025

To know or not to know? Curiosity and the value of prospective information in animals.

Victor Ajuwon, Tiago Monteiro, Alexandra K Schnell, Nicola S Clayton

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Learning & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Do goldfish like to be informed?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Epistemic Curiosity in Kea Parrots and Human Children.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victor AjuwonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. va354@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5116-641X
Tiago MonteiroWilliam James Centre for Research, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Alexandra K SchnellDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Nicola S ClaytonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust Research Project GrantThe Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology CEECINST/00013/2021/CP2779/CT0009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and other animals often seek instrumental information to strategically improve their decisions in the present. Our curiosity also leads us to acquire non-instrumental information that is not immediately useful but can be encoded in memory and stored for use in the future by means of episodic recall. Despite its adaptive benefits and central role in human cognition, questions remain about the cognitive mechanisms and evolutionary origins that underpin curiosity. Here, we comparatively review recent empirical studies that some authors have suggested reflects curiosity in nonhuman animals. We focus on findings from laboratory tasks in which individuals can choose to gain advanced information about uncertain future outcomes, even though the information cannot be used to increase future rewards and is often costly. We explore the prevalence of preferences in these tasks across animals, discuss the theoretical advances that they have promoted, and outline some limitations in contemporary research. We also discuss several features of human curiosity that can guide future empirical research aimed at characterising and understanding curiosity in animals. Though the prevalence of curiosity in animals is actively debated, we surmise that investigating behavioural candidates for curiosity-motivated behaviour in a broader range of species and contexts, should help promote theoretical advances in our understanding of cognitive principles and evolutionary pressures that support curiosity-driven behaviour.

Indexed as

Exploratory BehaviorAnimalsCognitionHumansRewardComparative cognitionMemoryMetacognitionOperant conditioning

Identifiers

PMID39414697
PMCPMC11880187

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.