Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39414952›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A self-adjuvanted VLPs-based Covid-19 vaccine proven versatile, safe, and highly protective.

Larissa Vuitika, Nelson Côrtes, Vanessa B Malaquias, Jaqueline D Q Silva, Aline Lira, Wasim A Prates-Syed, Lena F Schimke, Daniela Luz, Ricardo Durães-Carvalho, Andrea Balan and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Nanoparticle-Based Pulmonary Immune Engineering.Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Larissa VuitikaDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nelson CôrtesDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vanessa B MalaquiasDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jaqueline D Q SilvaDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Aline LiraDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wasim A Prates-SyedDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lena F SchimkeDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela LuzLaboratory of Bacteriology, Butantan Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo Durães-CarvalhoSão Paulo School of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Andrea BalanApplied Structural Biology Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil.
Niels O S CâmaraDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Otavio Cabral-MarquesDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
José E KriegerHeart Institute, Clinical Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Laboratory of Genetics and Molecular Cardiology, Clinical Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mario H HirataDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Cabral-MirandaDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. gcabral.miranda@usp.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/09404-0 (Post-doc Scholarship)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo AL: 2021/03102-5 (PhD ScholarshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo GC-M: 2019/14526-0, 2020/04667-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo NC 2021/03508-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo WAPS 2021/08468-8 (PhD Scholarship)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination has played a critical role in mitigating COVID-19. Despite the availability of licensed vaccines, there remains a pressing need for improved vaccine platforms that provide high protection, safety, and versatility, while also reducing vaccine costs. In response to these challenges, our aim is to create a self-adjuvanted vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, utilizing Virus-Like Particles (VLPs) as the foundation. To achieve this, we produced bacteriophage (Qβ) VLPs in a prokaryotic system and purified them using a rapid and cost-effective strategy involving organic solvents. This method aims to solubilize lipids and components of the cell membrane to eliminate endotoxins present in bacterial samples. For vaccine formulation, Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) antigens were conjugated using chemical crosslinkers, a process compatible with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) confirmed the expected folding and spatial configuration of the QβVLPs vaccine. Additionally, vaccine formulation assessment involved SDS-PAGE stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue, Western blotting, and stereomicroscopic experiments. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of the vaccine formulation were conducted to assess its capacity to induce a protective immune response without causing side effects. Vaccine doses of 20 µg and 50 µg stimulated the production of neutralizing antibodies. In in vivo testing, the group of animals vaccinated with 50 µg of vaccine formulation provided complete protection against virus infection, maintaining stable body weight without showing signs of disease. In conclusion, the QβVLPs-RBD vaccine has proven to be effective and safe, eliminating the necessity for supplementary adjuvants and offering a financially feasible approach. Moreover, this vaccine platform demonstrates flexibility in targeting Variants of Concern (VOCs) via established conjugation protocols with VLPs.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, Virus-Like ParticleAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, VaccineAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccinationAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, VaccineAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, Virus-Like ParticleCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2VaccineVLPs platform

Identifiers

PMID39414952
PMCPMC11484777

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.