Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415489›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025

Introducing a specified on-line multimodal prehabilitation approach for total knee replacement surgery candidates using data from the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory field-based, pre-post, mixed methods implementation pilot study.

Laura Garland, Jamie Gibson, Rashida Pickford, Gareth D Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura GarlandPhysiotherapy Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, England, UK.
Jamie GibsonPhysiotherapy Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1135-3613
Rashida PickfordPhysiotherapy Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, England, UK.
Gareth D JonesPhysiotherapy Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5516-9418

Funding

Health Education England
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleIndividuals waiting for total-knee-replacement surgery are at risk of developing morbidities and frailty which may affect their postoperative recovery. Multi-modal prehabilitation could mitigate these unintentional effects. AIMS AND

objectivesTo implement and evaluate a specified online multi-modal prehabilitation intervention in patients waiting for total-knee-replacement surgery in a large urban acute hospital trust.

methodA non-randomised, pre/post analysis implementation pilot with a nested qualitative study was conducted and is reported following the standards for implementation studies (StaRI) guidance. Of 35 listed cases, 12 (34%) were eligible, recruited, and completed an 8-week multi-modal online intervention incorporating 5 modalities (i) cardiovascular exercise, (ii) strength/balance function, (iii) smoking cessation, (iv) opioid use, (v) nutritional intake. Interventions were specified using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System, where rehabilitation treatment theory accounts for discrete treatment components. Two participated in an online qualitative interview post-intervention. Process evaluation included intervention fidelity, eligibility/recruitment/retention rates, and clinical outcomes included knee function, frailty, gait velocity, anxiety/depression, and quality of life.

resultsFive participants (42%) completed the intervention and were retained at follow-up. The intervention was delivered online at specified doses, frequency/durations indicative of high respective adherence, quantity, and exposure fidelity. There was significant improvement in median oxford knee score (p = 0.015), gait velocity (p = 0.040) and anxiety (p = 0.023). The interview revealed 5 themes; surgery preconceptions, motivation, acceptability, postoperative experiences, and future recommendations confirming acceptance of the intervention by virtue of adhering to the treatment exposure delivered as planned.

conclusionThe specified multi-modal prehabilitation was acceptable, implementable, and demonstrated evidence of preliminary efficacy. Further experimental pilot work that represents the spectrum of frailty, obesity, quality of life, and comorbidities associated with total-knee-replacement surgery is indicated.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCOVID-19AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPreoperative ExerciseQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2exerciseimplementationknee surgery rehabilitationpreoperative caretelerehabilitationtreatment efficacy

Identifiers

PMID39415489
PMCPMC12021319

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.