Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415883›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2024

Balancing benefits and risks of exercise in pregnancy: a qualitative analysis of social media discussion.

Emilie J M Côté, Madeleine Benton, Rachael Gardner, Rachel Tribe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emilie J M CôtéDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0529-6651
Madeleine BentonDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0779-6334
Rachael GardnerReproductive Health and Childbirth, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-9435-3703
Rachel TribeDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-9978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise improves pregnancy outcomes, but few pregnant individuals meet physical activity guidelines. The main objective of this study was to explore the perception of exercise during pregnancy using posts and comments on Reddit, a large social media platform. Relevant user-generated posts and comments were identified on Reddit by searching systematically for a combination of keywords related to pregnancy and exercise. A dataset of 120 posts and 2892 comments was randomly selected for reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes relating to perceptions of benefits and risks to exercise in pregnancy and how they influence decision-making were generated: (1) perceived benefits of exercise: 'We all know that exercise is good for us'; (2) perceived risks of exercise: Exercise as 'off limits'; and (3) information seeking and decision-making: 'I'm kinda stumped on exercise'. While the benefits of exercise during pregnancy are well recognised among Reddit users, perceived risks significantly influence their decisions to start, continue, adjust or stop exercising. Healthcare providers play a crucial role in guiding these exercise choices, emphasising the need for them to provide evidence-based advice and support pregnant individuals in achieving optimal physical activity levels. Addressing misinformation and providing supportive counselling can help pregnant individuals navigate the complexities of exercise during this critical period.

Indexed as

BehaviourExercisePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39415883
PMCPMC11481124

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.