Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416760›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2024

Renal transplant nephrolithiasis: Presentation, management and follow-up with control comparisons.

Maxwell Sandberg, Adam Cohen, Megan Escott, Claudia Marie-Costa, Davis Temple, Rainer Rodriguez, Alex Gordon, Anita Rong, Brian Andres-Robusto, Emily H Roebuck and 9 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Erratum.BJUI compass · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Maxwell SandbergDepartment of Urology Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2880-1857
Adam CohenDepartment of Urology Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Megan EscottDepartment of Urology Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Claudia Marie-CostaWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Davis TempleWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Rainer RodriguezWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Alex GordonEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine Blacksburg Virginia USA.
Anita RongWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Brian Andres-RobustoWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Emily H RoebuckWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0857-4423
Emily YeWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Gavin UnderwoodWake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Arjun ChoudharyTufts University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA.
Wyatt WhitmanDepartment of Urology Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Christopher J WebbSection of Transplantation, Department of Surgery Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Robert J StrattaSection of Transplantation, Department of Surgery Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Kyle WoodTufts University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA.
Dean AssimosDepartment of Urology Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.
Majid MirzazadehDepartment of Urology Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Winston-Salem North Carolina USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To analyse the presentation, management and long-term outcomes of renal transplant patients who formed kidney stones in their allograft. The secondary aim was to identify risk factors for stone formation in this cohort. Materials and Methods: Patient information from an institutional renal transplant database was used to identify individuals who both did and did not form kidney stones following renal transplantation. Computerized tomography (CT) imaging was used to make the diagnosis of kidney stones and measure stone size. Age- and gender-matched controls never forming a stone in their allograft were used for comparative analysis to identify risk factors for stone formation in transplant patients. Results: A total of 8835 transplant patients were included in the study, of which 128 (1.4%) formed a kidney stone in their allograft after surgery. The mean time to kidney stone identification was 6.2 years, and the mean number of stones formed was 1.7, with a mean maximum size dimension on a CT scan of 5.7 mm per stone. A total of 26 patients were subjected to stone-removing procedures, the most common being ureteroscopy (42.3%). The primary intervention failed in eight patients requiring a secondary intervention, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) had the lowest success rate (60%). A total of 164 controls were identified. In comparison to controls, stone formers had lower serum calcium ( Conclusions: The rate of stone formation is low in transplant patients. Success rates for stone treatment vary based on the surgery selected, with PCNL being the worst. Graft survival rates were equivocal, but survival time was better in stone patients. Our analysis calls for further investigation of this important topic.

Indexed as

renal transplantrisk factorstonetreatmenturology

Identifiers

PMID39416760
PMCPMC11479801

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.