Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39417684›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2024

Understanding developmental system drift.

Áine McColgan, James DiFrisco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolutionary dynamics of the arthropod molting machinery.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Sex Determination in Sponges.Molecular reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Quantitative system drift.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Áine McColganTheoretical Biology Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-0700-4655
James DiFriscoTheoretical Biology Lab, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9600-1013

Funding

Cancer Research UK CC2240Medical Research Council CC2240Wellcome Trust CC2240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental system drift (DSD) occurs when the genetic basis for homologous traits diverges over time despite conservation of the phenotype. In this Review, we examine the key ideas, evidence and open problems arising from studies of DSD. Recent work suggests that DSD may be pervasive, having been detected across a range of different organisms and developmental processes. Although developmental research remains heavily reliant on model organisms, extrapolation of findings to non-model organisms can be error-prone if the lineages have undergone DSD. We suggest how existing data and modelling approaches may be used to detect DSD and estimate its frequency. More direct study of DSD, we propose, can inform null hypotheses for how much genetic divergence to expect on the basis of phylogenetic distance, while also contributing to principles of gene regulatory evolution.

Indexed as

Genetic DriftAnimalsBiological EvolutionHumansPhenotypePhylogenyCompensatory evolutionDevelopmental system driftEvo-devoGene regulatory networksModel organismsRobustness

Identifiers

PMID39417684
PMCPMC11529278

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.