ArticleAnnals of vascular surgery2025
Association between Regional Market Competition and Early Femoropopliteal Interventions for Claudication.
Article in Annals of vascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRegional market competition is known to impact practice patterns in surgical care. We aimed to investigate the association of regional market competition with the utilization of early peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) for the treatment of claudication, and the subsequent impact on clinical outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data from January 2019 to December 2021 to identify patients with a new diagnosis of claudication. We calculated the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index for all sites of service performing PVI according to Health Service Area. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of regional market competition with early (<6 months) PVI for claudication, and progression to chronic limb-threatening ischemia, repeat PVI, and major amputation.
resultsWe identified 300,492 patients with a new diagnosis of claudication (mean age 73.8 years, 51.6% male, 11.1% Black), of which 6.1% underwent an early PVI for claudication. Most patients (72.4%) were treated in low-competition markets. After adjusting for patient characteristics, patients treated in moderate-competition markets had the highest odds of receiving an early PVI. Regional market competition was not associated with conversion to chronic limb-threatening ischemia or repeat PVI (P > 0.05), but patients treated in high- (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.86) and moderate- (aHR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.92) competition markets had lower hazards of major amputation compared to patients treated in low-competition markets. Early PVI was significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes after adjusting for all factors including market competition (all, P < 0.05).
conclusionsThere is a complex interplay between regional market competition, early PVI utilization, and subsequent clinical outcomes for patients with claudication. Early PVI continues to demonstrate a strong association with unfavorable clinical outcomes even when accounting for market competition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.