ArticleBMC research notes2024
Recruitment of pregnant and breastfeeding women in pharmacokinetic studies: strategies, opportunities, barriers, and recommendations.
Article in BMC research notes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence, safety evidence, and determinants of medicine use during breastfeeding among women in Kampala, Uganda.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Pragmatic and contextualized methods selection for safety assessment of infant systemic exposure through human milk: the Milk4baby decision tree approach - a contribution from the concePTION project.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Clinical lactation studies. Acting on key recommendations over the last decade.npj women's health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnant and breastfeeding women are often under-represented in clinical research, including pharmacokinetic studies, due to ethical and logistical challenges. This paper examines strategies to improve the recruitment and retention of this demographic in pharmacokinetic research, drawing on experiences from five studies conducted at the Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Uganda. Key strategies implemented include Community Advisory Board meetings, the involvement of Peer Mothers as Co-Investigators, established recruitment sites, the use of safety protocols, and the utilization of diverse communication platforms, including social media and stakeholder meetings. Despite these efforts, substantial barriers, such as scheduling conflicts and frequent staff turnover at recruitment sites, continue to threaten progress. The paper recommends flexible scheduling, strengthening public engagement, and transparent demonstration of adherence to ethical principles; justice, non-maleficence, respect, and beneficence to ensure the safety and inclusivity of pregnant and breastfeeding women. The inclusion of this population in pharmacokinetic studies is essential for providing evidence-based care that meets their unique health needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.