Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39420408›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2024

Recruitment of pregnant and breastfeeding women in pharmacokinetic studies: strategies, opportunities, barriers, and recommendations.

Ritah Nakijoba, Aida N Kawuma, Simon Peter Asiimwe, Christine Turyahabwe, Jovia Christine Tabwenda, Jacqueline Kyeyune, Johnson Magoola, Francis Williams Ojara, Catriona Waitt

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ritah NakijobaInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda. rnakijoba@idi.co.ug.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6626-0329
Aida N KawumaInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7975-0178
Simon Peter AsiimweInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9804-6079
Christine TuryahabweInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6510-0887
Jovia Christine TabwendaInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9108-4331
Jacqueline KyeyuneInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0156-5615
Johnson MagoolaInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1710-7042
Francis Williams OjaraInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6425-6828
Catriona WaittInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0134-5855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant and breastfeeding women are often under-represented in clinical research, including pharmacokinetic studies, due to ethical and logistical challenges. This paper examines strategies to improve the recruitment and retention of this demographic in pharmacokinetic research, drawing on experiences from five studies conducted at the Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Uganda. Key strategies implemented include Community Advisory Board meetings, the involvement of Peer Mothers as Co-Investigators, established recruitment sites, the use of safety protocols, and the utilization of diverse communication platforms, including social media and stakeholder meetings. Despite these efforts, substantial barriers, such as scheduling conflicts and frequent staff turnover at recruitment sites, continue to threaten progress. The paper recommends flexible scheduling, strengthening public engagement, and transparent demonstration of adherence to ethical principles; justice, non-maleficence, respect, and beneficence to ensure the safety and inclusivity of pregnant and breastfeeding women. The inclusion of this population in pharmacokinetic studies is essential for providing evidence-based care that meets their unique health needs.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingPatient SelectionFemaleHumansPharmacokineticsPregnancyPregnant PeopleUgandaBreastmilkLactationMalariaPharmacokineticsPregnant and breastfeeding womenTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID39420408
PMCPMC11488264

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.