ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of Risk Factors and Prognostic Predictors for Endo-Perio Lesions in Indian Cohorts: An Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Pulp Sensibility Tests and Radiographic Findings for Endodontic-Periodontal Lesions.Cureus · 2026Article
- Endo-Periodontal Lesions in Endodontically Treated Teeth with Periapical Pathology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndodontic and periodontal tissues exhibit a significant interrelationship, whereby pathologies affecting one tissue can precipitate the involvement of the other. The primary objective of this study was to assess the risk factors associated with endo-perio lesions (EPLs). The secondary objective was to assess the prognostic predictors for such lesions and the prevalence rate of EPLs involving both pulpal and periodontal tissues in Indian cohorts. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective observational study was conducted on 2170 teeth with EPLs in Indian adults aged > 18 years. A detailed history of smoking, tobacco chewing, and the development of EPLs was obtained from all patients. Detailed periodontal and endodontic examinations were conducted by two calibrated examiners. Intraoral periapical radiographs (IOPAs) were obtained to diagnose EPLs. The chi-square test of association was used to analyze the association between independent and dependent variables, and the strength of association was presented by Pearson contingency coefficient (r). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify reliable factors for diagnosing EPLs. A statistical significance threshold of 0.05 was established.
resultsThe prevalence of EPLs involving pulpal and periodontal tissues was 29.49%. Type 1 lesions (EPLs involving only pulpal tissue) were most commonly seen at 41-45 years of age, type 2 lesions (EPLs involving primary pulpal and secondary periodontal tissue), and type 3 lesions (EPLs involving only periodontal tissue) at 26-30 years of age, and type 4 lesions (EPLs involving primary periodontal and secondary pulpal tissue) at 31-35 years of age. The pulp was found to be non-vital in all cases of type 3 lesions, and faulty restoration or improper root canal treatment (RCT) was the main risk factor for such lesions. Occupational trauma was found to be the most common risk factor for type 3 and type 4 lesions.
conclusionSmoking, age, tooth type, occlusal trauma, faulty restorations and RCT, presence of caries, periapical pathology, periodontitis, bone loss, and pulp vitality were significantly associated with EPLs. Pulp vitality and bone loss were two prognostic predictors of EPLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.