Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421476›Full record

ReviewMissouri medicine

Sarcoidosis: A Review of the Guidelines and What's To Come.

Timothy Kable, Samuel DuMontier, Christopher Streiler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timothy KablePulmonary and Critical Care Fellow, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Health Hospital, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Samuel DuMontierPulmonary and Critical Care Fellow, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Health Hospital, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Christopher StreilerAssistant Professor, Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellow, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Health Hospital, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcoidosis is a disease hallmarked by granulomatous inflammation of nearly all organ systems. Though it has been widely recognized for over 100 years, much remains unknown about the etiology and pathophysiology of the disease. Due in part to this is ambiguity, diagnosis and treatment, algorithms have been difficult to create and even harder to develop a strong evidence base for. In this article, we attempt to consolidate the guidelines, recommendations, and algorithms provided by multiple societies across the US and abroad. We have assembled these into a concise quick-reference format article for those looking for a cohesive approach to the diagnosis and management of sarcoidosis, including when it doesn't respond to initial therapy. We also delve into a new and promising treatment that is in the investigation pipeline, but not yet ready for implementation.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicSarcoidosisAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID39421476
PMCPMC11482848

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.