Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421771›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2024

Full-field amplitude speckle decorrelation angiography.

Giulia Mansutti, Martin Villiger, Brett E Bouma, Néstor Uribe-Patarroyo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giulia MansuttiWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4666-1782
Martin VilligerWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3819-1271
Brett E BoumaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Néstor Uribe-PatarroyoWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9201-2196

Funding

TRD3: Percutaneous and Interstitial ImagingP41EB015903 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Benjamin James Vakoc · 2012 to 2026
$22.4M
Blood flow-based guidance and diagnostics using OCTK25EB024595 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI URIBE-PATARROYO, NESTOR · 2017 to 2021
$825k
NIBIB NIH HHS K25 EB024595NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a new simple and cost-effective optical imaging technique, full-field amplitude speckle decorrelation angiography (FASDA), capable of visualizing skin microvasculature with high resolution, and sensitive to small, superficial vessels with slow blood flow and larger, deeper vessels with faster blood flow. FASDA makes use of a laser source with limited temporal coherence, can be implemented with cameras with conventional frame rates, and does not require raster scanning. The proposed imaging technique is based on the simultaneous evaluation of two metrics: the blood flow index, a contrast-based metric used in laser speckle contrast imaging, and the adaptive speckle decorrelation index (ASDI), a new metric that we defined based on the second-order autocorrelation function that considers the limited speckle modulation that occurs in partially-coherent imaging. We demonstrate excellent delineation of small, superficial vessels with slow blood flow in skin nevi using ASDI and larger, deeper vessels with faster blood flow using BFI, providing a powerful new tool for the imaging of microvasculature with significantly lower hardware complexity and cost than other optical imaging techniques.

Identifiers

PMID39421771
PMCPMC11482163

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.