Evidence mapPaperPMID 39422155Full record

Trial reportJournal of advanced nursing2025

Exploring Implementation Processes of a Multicomponent Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units (FICUS) Study: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation.

Saskia Oesch, Lotte Verweij, Marco Riguzzi, Tracy Finch, Rahel Naef

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05280691 (A Multi-center, Cluster Randomized Superiority Trial of a Guideline-based Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05280691 nacompletednot on this map

A Multi-center, Cluster Randomized Superiority Trial of a Guideline-based Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units

TypeinterventionalSponsorRahel NaefRan2022 to 2025Enrolled885ConditionsPostintensive Care Syndrome, Family Members, Quality of Life, Depression, AnxietyArmsFamily Support Intervention (FSI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saskia OeschInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6639-5875
Lotte VerweijInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4727-0126
Marco RiguzziInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-351X
Tracy FinchDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, North Umbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8647-735X
Rahel NaefInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5872-076X

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 33IC30_198778/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the experience with and progress of the implementation of a Family Support Intervention (FSI) into adult intensive care units (ICUs) as part of the cluster-randomised FICUS trial.

designA mixed-methods process evaluation using a multiple case study approach guided by the normalisation process theory.

methodsThis study took place between June 2022 and July 2023 in eight Swiss ICUs randomised to the intervention arm. A tailored implementation strategy was used to introduce the multicomponent FSI, consisting of a new family nursing role and a family care pathway, into interprofessional ICU teams. Participants were 40 ICU key clinical partners. Qualitative data were collected twice, early (3-6 months) and mid-implementation (9-12 months), using small group interviews. A questionnaire with psychometric measures (Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, Normalisation Measure Development Questionnaire) was administered at mid-implementation. RITA pragmatic rapid thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Qualitative and quantitative results were then compared across ICUs (cases).

findingsFindings indicated the desired progress of the FSI integration overall and across cases, with high acceptability and appropriateness ratings but only moderate to high feasibility scores. Study-related barriers were noted in all ICUs (i.e., FSI delivery as part of a clinical trial). Implementation barriers included family nurses' limited capacity and clinician's attitudes towards the FSI. Leadership support and interprofessional collaboration were identified as facilitators. Case-based, integrated findings yielded two implementation pathways, namely early and protracted adopters.

conclusionImplementation barriers were related to the feasibility of FSI delivery within the study context that required a high degree of standardisation and protocol adherence. Implementation progress was shaped by an interprofessional culture of family care, sufficient staff and time resources, and leadership support. The study's findings will inform future implementation of complex health interventions in ICUs. REPORTING

methodGood reporting of a Mixed-Methods Study (GRAMMS). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Within the FICUS trial, a patient and family advisory board with a patient expert, three family members and a patient with own lived experience of critical care collaborate with the research team.

Indexed as

Critical CareFamilyFamily NursingIntensive Care UnitsAdultAgedFamily SupportFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProfessional-Family RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandcritical carefamily supportimplementation sciencemixed‐method designnursingprocess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39422155
PMCPMC12535341

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.