Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39422704›Full record

ArticleNanoscale2024

Emergent conformational and aggregation properties of synergistic antimicrobial peptide combinations.

Miruna Serian, A James Mason, Christian D Lorenz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miruna SerianBiological Physics & Soft Matter Group, Department of Physics, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
A James MasonInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London SE1 9NH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-602X
Christian D LorenzBiological Physics & Soft Matter Group, Department of Physics, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1028-4804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synergy between antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) may be the key to their evolutionary success and could be exploited to develop more potent antibacterial agents. One of the factors thought to be essential for AMP potency is their conformational flexibility, but characterising the diverse conformational states of AMPs experimentally remains challenging. Here we introduce a method for characterising the conformational flexibility of AMPs and provide new insights into how the interplay between conformation and aggregation in synergistic AMP combinations yields emergent properties. We use unsupervised learning and molecular dynamics simulations to show that mixing two AMPs from the Winter Flounder family (pleurocidin (WF2) & WF1a) constrains their conformational space, reducing the number of distinct conformations adopted by the peptides, most notably for WF2. The aggregation behaviour of the peptides is also altered, favouring the formation of higher-order aggregates upon mixing. Critically, the interaction between WF1a and WF2 influences the distribution of WF2 conformations within aggregates, revealing how WF1a can modulate WF2 behaviour. Our work paves the way for deeper understanding of the synergy between AMPs, a fundamental process in nature.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial PeptidesDrug SynergismFish ProteinsFlounderProtein AggregatesProtein ConformationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial PeptidesFish ProteinsProtein Aggregates

Identifiers

PMID39422704
PMCPMC11488577

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.