ArticleClinical hemorheology and microcirculation2024
LiMAx test and ultrasound elastography to measure biomarkers of declining liver function in patients with liver fibrosis: A correlation analysis.
Article in Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breath-Based Diagnostics in Liver Diseases: Dynamic Assessment of Hepatic Metabolic Reserve and Liver Fibrosis.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- The application value of multimodal ultrasound imaging technology in the prediction of early-stage type 2 diabetic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMonitoring liver changes is crucial in the management of liver fibrosis. Current diagnostic methods include liver function tests such as the Liver Maximum Capacity (LiMAx) test and measurements of liver stiffness. While the LiMAx test quantifies liver function through 13C-methacetin metabolism, ultrasound (US) elastography noninvasively assesses liver stiffness. The relationship between the findings of these methods in patients with liver fibrosis is not fullyunderstood.
objectiveThis study evaluated the correlation between LiMAx measurements of liver function and US elastography-based liver stiffness measurements to better understand the interplay between functional and structural liver parameters in fibrotic liver disease. Additionally, the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and these parameters isevaluated.
methodsThis retrospective study analysed data from 97 patients who underwent both LiMAx testing and real-time elastography, resulting in a total data set of 108 examinations. The correlations between the results of the LiMAx test and elastography and their relationships with body mass index (BMI) were analysed.
resultsThere was a significant negative correlation (r = -0.25, p < 0.05) between LiMAx test values and liver stiffness measurements. BMI was significantly negatively correlated with LiMAx values (r = -0.29, p < 0.001) but not significantly correlated with liver stiffness values.
conclusionsThis retrospective study confirms the results of previous studies showing a notable but weak association between liver function and liver stiffness. Our results highlight the potential value of both tests as complementary tools for the evaluation of liver health, reinforcing the necessity for a multimodal approach to liver assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.