Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39423964›Full record

ArticleBrain research2025

Delayed-and-abbreviated environmental enrichment after traumatic brain injury confers neurobehavioral benefits similar to immediate-and-continuous exposure.

Rachel A Bittner, Anna M Greene, Jacob B Leary, Hailey M Donald, Haley E Capeci, Eleni H Moschonas, Jeffrey P Cheng, Corina O Bondi, Anthony E Kline

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel A BittnerDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Anna M GreeneDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jacob B LearyDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Hailey M DonaldDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Haley E CapeciDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Eleni H MoschonasDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jeffrey P ChengDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Corina O BondiDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Anthony E KlineDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: klineae@upmc.edu.

Funding

Optimizing Environmental Enrichment to Model Preclinical NeurorehabilitationR01NS084967 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2014 to 2025
$3.7M
Neurobehavioral, cognitive, and mechanistic effects of intranasally administered neural stem cells and environmental enrichment after cortical impact injury in ratsR01NS121037 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GUTOVA, MARGARITA, KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2021 to 2024
$2.0M
Traumatic brain injury and aging: targeting the cholinergic system for deficits in sustained attention and executive functionR01NS110609 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONDI, CORINA OANA · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Neurobehavioral and pathophysiological effects of traumatic brain injury in spontaneously hypertensive ratsR21NS137253 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONDI, CORINA OANA · 2024 to 2025
$437k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084967NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110609NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS121037NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS137253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental enrichment (EE) consists of increased living space, complex stimuli, and social interaction that collectively confer neurobehavioral benefits in preclinical models of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The typical EE approach entails implementation immediately after surgery and continual exposure, which is not clinically applicable, as TBI patients often only receive rehabilitation after critical care, and then only for a few hours per day. We are focused on developing a clinically relevant model of neurorehabilitation by refining the timing of initiation and duration of EE exposure after TBI. The goal of this experiment is to compare the typical EE approach to paradigms where EE is delayed by 3 or 7 days after TBI and then provided for only 6 h per day, which better mimics the clinic. The hypothesis is that the delayed-and-abbreviated EE paradigms will promote neurobehavioral benefits like the typical approach of immediate-and-continuous exposure. To test the hypothesis, anesthetized adult male rats underwent a controlled cortical impact of moderate severity (2.8 mm deformation at 4 m/s) or sham injury and then were randomly assigned to post-operative EE or standard (STD) housing. Motor ability, spatial learning, and memory retention were assessed. The hypothesis was confirmed as all EE-treated groups performed better than the STD group in all behavioral assessments (p < 0.05) and did not differ from one another (p > 0.05). The ability of EE to provide significant behavioral benefits even when delayed and delivered in moderation affords further support for EE as a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation and offers greater insight into the length of the therapeutic window.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticEnvironmentRats, Sprague-DawleyAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDisease Models, AnimalMaleMaze LearningRatsRecovery of FunctionSpatial LearningTime FactorsBehaviorControlled cortical impactEnvironmental enrichmentLearning and memoryMorris water mazeRecoveryTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39423964
PMCPMC12107718

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.