ArticleEnvironmental research2024
Development of a metabolomic risk score for exposure to traffic-related air pollution: A multi-cohort study.
Article in Environmental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating cardiometabolic metabolite profiles associated with ambient air pollution and atrial fibrillation risk: a prospective cohort study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Effects of Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution on Human Metabolome in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To synthesize vast amounts of high-throughput biological information, omics-fields like epigenetics have applied risk scores to develop biomarkers for environmental exposures. Extending the risk score analytic tool to the metabolomic data would be highly beneficial. This research aimed to develop and evaluate metabolomic risk score (metRS) approaches reflecting the biological response to traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) exposure (fine particulate matter, black carbon, and nitrogen dioxide). A simulation study compared three metRS methodologies: elastic net regression, which uses penalized regression to select metabolites, and two variations of thresholding, where a p-value cutoff is used to select metabolites. The methods performance was compared to assess 1) ability to correctly select metabolites associated with daily TRAP and 2) ability of the risk score to predict daily TRAP exposure. Power calculations and false discovery rates (FDR) were calculated for each approach. This metRS was applied to two real cohorts, the Center for Health Discovery and Wellbeing (CHDWB, n = 180) and Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH, n = 200). In simulations, elastic net regression consistently presented inflated FDR for both high and low effect sizes and across all three sample sizes (n = 200; 500; 1000). Power to detect correct metabolites exceeded 0.8 for all three sample sizes in all three methods. In the real data application assessing associations of metabolomics risk scores and TRAP, associations were largely null. While we did not identify strong associations between the risk scores and TRAP in the real data application, metabolites selected by the risk score approaches were enriched in pathways that are well-known for their association with TRAP. These results demonstrate that certain methodologies to construct metabolomics risk scores are statistically robust and valid; however, standardized metabolic profiling and large sample sizes are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.