Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39425094›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

The decriminalization of illicit drugs in British Columbia: a national evaluation protocol.

Cayley Russell, Farihah Ali, Sameer Imtiaz, Amanda Butler, Alissa Greer, Jürgen Rehm, Decriminalization Evaluation Research Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cayley RussellInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 250 College St., Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada. Cayley.Russell@camh.ca.
Farihah AliInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 250 College St., Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada.
Sameer ImtiazInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 250 College St., Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada.
Amanda ButlerSchool of Criminology, Simon Fraser University (SFU), 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Alissa GreerSchool of Criminology, Simon Fraser University (SFU), 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Jürgen RehmInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 250 College St., Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada.
Decriminalization Evaluation Research Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOn January 31st, 2023, the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada, was granted a federal exemption allowing adults (aged 18 +) to possess up to 2.5 g of select illicit drugs. The exemption will be in place for three years (2023-2026), marking the first formal decriminalization of illicit drug policy reform in Canada. BC's decriminalization initiative is premised on several goals. This project seeks to evaluate each of these goals and their individual and combined contributions to determine the overall success of this policy.

methodsThe following protocol paper provides a detailed outline of a five-year (2022-2027) national evaluation of BC's decriminalization initiative, as well as the specific objectives, methodologies, and planned analyses for eight interrelated sub-studies that comprise the evaluation. These sub-studies fall under the following five topical areas of research: 1) people who use drugs (PWUD), 2) the police and the criminal justice system, 3) the general public, 4) the health services system, and 5) an economic analysis. Additional research activities may also be explored.

resultsThe overall evaluation and specific sub-study designs were informed by intensive stakeholder engagement. The evaluation was developed in collaboration with an international expert committee who came together to undertake a nominal group technique to decide on the final evaluation design and corresponding logic model. The evaluation will also employ an advisory board and individual sub-study working groups comprised of experts and PWUD who will oversee the development and implementation of the overall evaluation as well as each sub-study. DISCUSSION: This evaluation will draw on implementation science research practices to evaluate and understand the full impacts of this novel drug policy experiment. Results will be widely disseminated through manuscripts, reports, presentations, and infographics, which will be adapted and tailored for specific audiences. The protocol identifies several anticipated challenges and limitations. This evaluation's evidence-based findings will be poised to offer pivotal insights that can shape and refine the discourse on drug policy and will serve as a critical resource for understanding the multifaceted impacts of decriminalization.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsAdultBritish ColumbiaDrug and Narcotic ControlHumansPoliceProgram EvaluationSubstance-Related DisordersIllicit DrugsAddictionCanadaDecriminalizationDrug PolicyEvaluationPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID39425094
PMCPMC11490149

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.