ArticleBiomedical engineering online2024
A transcriptomic analysis of dental pulp stem cell senescence in vitro.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum-induced recovery of proliferative capacity and differentiation potential in aged dental pulp stem cells.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Article
- Decoding Dental Stem Cell Aging: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Strategies, and Beyond.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Senescence of dental pulp stem cells: phenotypes, underlying mechanisms and regulatory molecules.Human cell · 2025Review
- Identification of key genes associated with cellular aging and mitochondria in acute myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- New considerations in selecting donors for dental pulp stem cells: a pilot study.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeThe use of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) as autologous stem cells for tissue repair and regenerative techniques is a significant area of global research. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of long-term in vitro culture on the multidifferentiation potential of hDPSCs and the potential molecular mechanisms involved. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe tissue block method was used to extract hDPSCs from orthodontic-minus-extraction patients, which were then expanded and cultured in vitro for 12 generations. Stem cells from passages three, six, nine, and twelve were selected. Flow cytometry was used to detect the expression of stem cell surface markers, and CCK-8 was used to assess cell proliferation. β-Galactosidase staining was employed to detect cellular senescence, Alizarin Red S staining to assess osteogenic potential, and Oil Red O staining to evaluate lipogenic capacity. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was conducted to identify differentially expressed genes in DPSCs and investigate their potential mechanisms.
resultsWith increasing passage numbers, pulp stem cells showed an increase in senescence and a decrease in proliferative capacity and osteogenic-lipogenic multidifferentiation potential. The expression of stem cell surface markers CD34 and CD45 was stable, whereas the expression of CD73, CD90, and CD105 decreased with increasing passages. According to the RNA-seq analysis, the differentially expressed genes CFH, WNT16, HSD17B2, IDI1, and COL5A3 may be associated with stem cell senescence.
conclusionIncreased in vitro expansion induced cellular senescence in pulp stem cells, which resulted in a reduction in their proliferative capacity and osteogenic-lipogenic differentiation potential. The differential expression of genes such as CFH, WNT16, HSD17B2, IDI1, and COL5A3 may represent a potential mechanism for the induction of cellular senescence in pulp stem cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.