Trial reportJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2025
Secukinumab efficacy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4): A post hoc analysis of the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE trials.
Trial report in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study Assessing Short (16 Weeks) and Long-term Efficacy (up to 1 Year), Safety, and Tolerability of 2 Subcutaneous Secukinumab Dose Regimens in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (SUNSHINE).
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study Assessing Short (16 Weeks) and Long-term Efficacy (up to 1 Year), Safety, and Tolerability of 2 Subcutaneous Secukinumab Dose Regimens in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (SUNRISE)
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Secukinumab efficacy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4): A post hoc analysis of the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE trials.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Trial
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa and IL-17 Inhibitors: A Focus on Trials and Real-Life Data.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Biologics for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Network Meta Analysis and Meta Regression for Baseline Disease Severity.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2026Review
- Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Real-World Retrospective Study Demonstrating Clinical Efficacy and Safety Across Diverse Anatomical Sites.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
- Bimekizumab for Hidradenitis Suppurativa from Trials to Real Life: A Review of the Published Literature.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Review
- Clinical and mechanistic effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists in hidradenitis suppurativa and comorbidities.Science progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) is a validated tool that measures inflammatory lesions, including draining tunnels, in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).
objectiveTo evaluate secukinumab efficacy using IHS4 in patients with moderate to severe HS.
methodsData from the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE trials, which assessed subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg every 2 (SECQ2W) and 4 (SECQ4W) weeks in adults with moderate to severe HS, were analyzed. Assessments included changes from baseline in IHS4 and severity classification up to Week 52; IHS4-55, IHS4-75, IHS4-90 responses (55%, 75% and 90% reduction in IHS4) and concordance between IHS4-55 and HS clinical response (HiSCR), at Weeks 16 and 52.
resultsIn total, 1084 patients (SECQ2W = 361; SECQ4W = 360; placebo = 363) were analyzed. At Week 16, SECQ2W and SECQ4W demonstrated a numerically higher reduction in IHS4 from baseline versus placebo (adjusted mean [95% CI]: -10.80 [-12.30 to -9.30] and -9.46 [-10.96 to -7.96] vs. -4.92 [-6.43 to -3.41]); the reduction was maintained until Week 52 in both dose regimens. A greater proportion of patients achieved IHS4-55 with SECQ2W (43.4%) and SECQ4W (39.5%) versus placebo (31.5%) at Week 16, with further improvement at Week 52. Similar trends were observed for IHS4-75 and IHS4-90 responses. While no patients had mild disease based on IHS4 (80.7% had severe and 19.3% had moderate HS) at baseline, a greater proportion of patients were categorized as having mild disease at Week 16 in the SECQ2W (25.9%) and SECQ4W (24.0%) groups versus placebo (16.4%); this trend continued up to Week 52 in both dose regimens. Strong concordance (>85%) was observed between IHS4-55 and HiSCR.
conclusionsBoth SECQ2W and SECQ4W demonstrated efficacy in improving treatment response as measured by IHS4 and reducing disease severity versus placebo at Week 16 and these improvements were sustained through Week 52. These findings support that the dynamic and dichotomous IHS4 can efficiently detect treatment response changes in clinical trial settings. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: SUNSHINE (NCT03713619); SUNRISE (NCT03713632).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.