Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39425875›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2024

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the experiences of incarcerated pregnant people.

L Noël Marsh, Camille Kramer, Rebecca J Shlafer, Carolyn B Sufrin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L Noël MarshDepartment of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Wesley W. Posvar Hall, #3302, 230 S. Bouquet Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Camille KramerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Center for Medical Humanities and Social Medicine, 4940 Eastern Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. ckramer@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7033-3439
Rebecca J ShlaferDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware Street SE, Room 382, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA.
Carolyn B SufrinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Center for Medical Humanities and Social Medicine, 4940 Eastern Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.

Funding

Pregnancy and Postpartum Support Programs for Women in Prison: Maternal and Neonatal OutcomesR01HD103634 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SHLAFER, REBECCA J. · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD103634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impacted incarcerated populations, yet few studies have investigated the specific effects on incarcerated pregnant people. This study compares pregnant people's experiences of pregnancy and parenting in prison before and during the pandemic in order to explore the impacts of COVID-19 on this population.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with pregnant people at a state prison as part of a larger study on pregnant people's experiences during incarceration. Interviews explored participants' experiences and decision-making related to pregnancy and parenting while incarcerated. This secondary analysis compared interviews conducted between June 2019 and March 2020 (pre-COVID-19) to interviews conducted between June and November 2020 (during COVID-19). Interviews conducted during the pandemic included questions about the impact of COVID-19 on participants' experiences. Brief three and six-month follow-up interviews were conducted when possible.

resultsCOVID-19 introduced new stressors and exacerbated preexisting stressors around participants' reproductive and parenting experiences. Three major themes emerged: 1) incarceration causes mental, emotional, and physical distress during pregnancy and parenting; 2) COVID-19 worsened conditions of incarceration, contributing to participants' distress; and 3) the introduction of quarantine protocols during the pandemic felt uniquely punitive for pregnant and postpartum people.

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic was characterized as a major crisis and primary threat to public health, particularly for incarcerated individuals. Yet just as COVID-19 exacerbated preexisting disparities for marginalized, non-incarcerated communities, incarcerated pregnant people similarly described a "worsening" of already-intolerable conditions. The indiscriminate application of quarantine protocols for pregnant people reflects broader carceral logics of control that do not account for the wellbeing of pregnant and postpartum people and their infants, as evidenced by current practices of infant separation, a lack of support, and physically taxing living conditions.

Indexed as

COVID-19IncarcerationParentingPregnancyQuarantine

Identifiers

PMID39425875
PMCPMC11490136

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.