ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Impact of metadata in multimodal classification of bone tumours.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance comparison and future perspectives of deep learning and classical machine learning in bone tumor applications: a systematic review (2019-2025).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Hierarchical Multimodal Fusion of Multi-Sequence MRI and Clinical Metadata for the Classification of Rotator Cuff Tears.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A multimodal fusion model for bone tumor benign and malignant diagnosis: development and validation with clinical text and radiographs.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Multimodal AI fusion: integrating MRI with PET/CT, histopathology, and liquid biopsy for bone tumor diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate classification of bone tumours is crucial for guiding clinical decisions regarding treatment and follow-up. However, differentiating between various tumour types is challenging due to the rarity of certain entities, high intra-class variability, and limited training data in clinical practice. This study proposes a multimodal deep learning model that integrates clinical metadata and X-ray imaging to improve the classification of primary bone tumours. The dataset comprises 1,785 radiographs from 804 patients collected between 2000 and 2020, including metadata such as age, affected bone site, tumour position, and gender. Ten tumour types were selected, with histopathology or tumour board decisions serving as the reference standard.
methodsOur model is based on the NesT image classification model and a multilayer perceptron with a joint fusion architecture. Descriptive statistics included incidence and percentage ratios for discrete parameters, and mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range for continuous parameters.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 33.62 ± 18.60 years, with 54.73% being male. Our multimodal deep learning model achieved 69.7% accuracy in classifying primary bone tumours, outperforming the Vision Transformer model by five percentage points. SHAP values indicated that age had the most substantial influence among the considered metadata.
conclusionThe joint fusion approach developed in this study, integrating clinical metadata and imaging data, outperformed state-of-the-art models in classifying primary bone tumours. The use of SHAP values provided insights into the impact of different metadata on the model's performance, highlighting the significant role of age. This approach has potential implications for improving diagnostic accuracy and understanding the influence of clinical factors in tumour classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.