Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39427131›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Impact of metadata in multimodal classification of bone tumours.

Florian Hinterwimmer, Michael Guenther, Sarah Consalvo, Jan Neumann, Alexandra Gersing, Klaus Woertler, Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rainer Burgkart, Daniel Rueckert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Florian HinterwimmerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Trogerstraße 26, 81675, Munich, Germany. florian.hinterwimmer@tum.de.
Michael GuentherDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Trogerstraße 26, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sarah ConsalvoMusculoskeletal Radiology Section, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan NeumannMusculoskeletal Radiology Section, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexandra GersingMusculoskeletal Radiology Section, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Klaus WoertlerMusculoskeletal Radiology Section, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Rüdiger von Eisenhart-RotheDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Trogerstraße 26, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Rainer BurgkartDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Trogerstraße 26, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Daniel RueckertInstitute for AI and Informatics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate classification of bone tumours is crucial for guiding clinical decisions regarding treatment and follow-up. However, differentiating between various tumour types is challenging due to the rarity of certain entities, high intra-class variability, and limited training data in clinical practice. This study proposes a multimodal deep learning model that integrates clinical metadata and X-ray imaging to improve the classification of primary bone tumours. The dataset comprises 1,785 radiographs from 804 patients collected between 2000 and 2020, including metadata such as age, affected bone site, tumour position, and gender. Ten tumour types were selected, with histopathology or tumour board decisions serving as the reference standard.

methodsOur model is based on the NesT image classification model and a multilayer perceptron with a joint fusion architecture. Descriptive statistics included incidence and percentage ratios for discrete parameters, and mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range for continuous parameters.

resultsThe mean age of the patients was 33.62 ± 18.60 years, with 54.73% being male. Our multimodal deep learning model achieved 69.7% accuracy in classifying primary bone tumours, outperforming the Vision Transformer model by five percentage points. SHAP values indicated that age had the most substantial influence among the considered metadata.

conclusionThe joint fusion approach developed in this study, integrating clinical metadata and imaging data, outperformed state-of-the-art models in classifying primary bone tumours. The use of SHAP values provided insights into the impact of different metadata on the model's performance, highlighting the significant role of age. This approach has potential implications for improving diagnostic accuracy and understanding the influence of clinical factors in tumour classification.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsDeep LearningMetadataAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyYoung AdultBone neoplasmClassificationDeep learningMetadataRadiography

Identifiers

PMID39427131
PMCPMC11490032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.